Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1460879)	6/5/2024 2:56:31 PM
From: longz	1 Recommendation Recommended By Maple MAGA Respond to of 1575845

LMAZZORFF!

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1460879)	6/5/2024 3:02:21 PM
From: longz	2 Recommendations Recommended By Bill Maple MAGA Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575845

Problem solved in 25 seconds. The police in Brazil don't joke. pic.twitter.com/e8UjvN6YMF — RadioGenoa (@RadioGenoa) June 4, 2024

To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1460879)	6/5/2024 4:38:45 PM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Recommended By Maple MAGA Respond to of 1575845

Corporate media loses big by betting against Trump. 300+ comments on Jonathan Turley piece, big trouble at Wash Post. As someone who once wrote for the Washington Post regularly, I have long lamented the decline of the paper following a pronounced shift toward partisan and advocacy journalism. There was a time when the Post valued diversity of thought and steadfastly demanded staff write not as advocates but reporters. That began to change rapidly in the first Trump term. Suddenly, I found editors would slow walk copy, contest every line of your column, and make unfounded claims. In the meantime, they were increasingly running unsupported legal columns and even false statements from authors on the left. When confronted about columnists with demonstrably false statements, the Post simply shrugged.