Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: didjuneau who wrote (223294)	6/13/2024 12:51:27 PM
From: didjuneau	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224648

Garland in contempt: ‘If the DOJ has not indicted him by June 25, he will be forced to produce recordings or be held by Sergeant at Arms’ bizpacreview.com (prior vote was a resolution to advance the proceedings to hold this vote) June 13, 2024\| Chris Donaldson “It is up to Congress – not the Executive Branch – to determine what materials it needs to conduct its own investigations, and there are consequences for refusing to comply with lawful Congressional subpoenas,” Johnson said. “Congress has a responsibility to conduct oversight of the Special Counsel’s work and specifically Special Counsel Hur’s determination to prosecute President Biden for the clear violation of the law.” The House just voted to hold Garland in Contempt for refusing to comply with subpoenas. If the DOJ has not indicted him by June 25, I will call a vote to hold him in inherent contempt of Congress, and he will be forced to produce the recordings or be held by the Sergeant at Arms. pic.twitter.com/xybEAA3DbE — Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (@RepLuna) June 12, 2024