SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1463132)6/17/2024 1:01:43 AM
From: Maple MAGA 2 Recommendations

Recommended By
maceng2
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578284
 
Cyber warfare won't bother Svetlana in Yakutia as much as Sally in Seattle.

With hundreds of years of practice, Russians will survive longer than anyone else.

As Ukraine War Persists, Many Russians See Their Hopes Of Gas Heating Going Up In Smoke



A resident of the Siberian city of Minusinsk dons a gas mask to protest air pollution caused by burning coal for heat in 2021.

"We live like in olden times," a resident of the small city of Minusinsk, some 450 kilometers south of the capital of Siberia's sprawling Krasnoyarsk Krai, said while describing how he heats his home with buckets of coal. "It's awful running out in the freezing cold to fetch it, but what can I do? We are helpless."

Some 12 kilometers from Minusinsk, near the settlement of Bystraya, is one of many locations in Russia's eastern regions where natural gas bubbles up out of the ground. In the summer, locals bring sausages and other food to cook over the open " eternal flame s."

That gas field, as well as the Novo-Mikhailovsky gas field just 50 kilometers away, has been deemed uneconomical to develop. As in Minusinsk, homes in Bystraya are heated primarily with coal.

Although Russia is a global leader in the production of natural gas, millions of residents of its coldest, easternmost regions remain unconnected to gas lines. And Russia's costly war against neighboring Ukraine -- now in its third year since the full-scale invasion with no end in sight -- is eroding any chances that will change soon.

"I would pay to get gas," the older man from Minusinsk added.* "But how much? There are no gas lines. No infrastructure. No estimate of the cost to the consumer. We aren't even dreaming about getting gas."

Hard Times

Connecting consumers in Siberia and the Far East to natural-gas lines has been a dream since Soviet times. Putin made it an issue in his 2004 election campaign, and he has been regularly queried about it during his nationally televised Direct Line question-and-answer sessions.

Yet the connection rates remain minuscule: 1 percent in the Irkutsk region and even less in Khakassia, Tyva, and most of Krasnodar Krai. Across the region each winter, officials regularly issued air-quality warnings because of the smog from burning coal. In 2021, children from Minusinsk donned gas masks and recorded video appeals in which they begged Putin to do something about their community's "black skies."

Responsibility for the gasification program has primarily fallen to the state-controlled natural-gas monopoly Gazprom, which has reported some progress in the effort in recent years. In January, the government said access to natural gas -- which officials refer to as gasification -- had increased from 73 percent to 73.8 percent in 2023, with 485,000 homes reportedly being connected to the network.



Smog from burning coal blankets the city of Abakan in December 2023.

At a meeting in the Kremlin in December 2023, Gazprom CEO Aleksei Miller told President Vladimir Putin that the gasification of Russia would "absolutely" be 100 percent completed by 2030.

Such optimistic forecasts notwithstanding, Gazprom is facing hard times. Last month, the behemoth reported an annual loss for 2023 of 629 billion rubles ($7.1 billion), its first annual loss in a quarter-century. The revenues lost from sharply declining sales to Europe in the wake of Moscow's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine have not nearly been compensated by increased sales to China, with Beijing -- from a position of strength -- negotiating terms far less lucrative than what Europe has been paying. In 2023, Russia was selling gas to China for $257 per 1,000 cubic meters, while Europe and Turkey were paying $320.

A Gazprom-commissioned analysis written in late 2023 said it was unlikely the company would be able to achieve 2020 export levels any earlier than 2035, the Financial Times reported on June 5. Analysts told the paper Gazprom is pressing the government to raise domestic gas prices or provide the company tax breaks or other subsidies.



A woman in Bystraya warms herself by a natural-gas vent. (file photo)

In April, the Russian business daily Kommersant also reported that Gazprom was lobbying the government to "liberalize" domestic gas rates in connection with "the fall in exports since the beginning of military action in Ukraine."

Oil-and-gas industry analyst Mikhail Krutikhin told RFE/RL that Moscow and Gazprom are making a mistake by pinning their hopes on sales to China, where future demand is uncertain. Instead of building new infrastructure to sell more gas to Beijing, he argued, Gazprom should look closer to home.

"They could be doing something for the domestic market," he told RFE/RL's Russian Service. "They could step up, intensify the gasification of Russian settlements. But this is not happening. Instead, Gazprom goes after another grandiose project that the Chinese haven't even signed off on: the Power of Siberia-2 gas pipeline."

'Not In Our Lifetimes'

In March 2023, when the government of Khakassia submitted a gasification plan to the central government comprising three possible ways forward, the Energy Ministry responded that "because of the distance separating Khakassia from the existing gas infrastructure, it is now necessary to consider alternative ways" of reducing the harm from coal heating, including developing electric heating or more modern coal furnaces.



In October 2023, two men from the Siberian city of Surgut climbed Russia's highest summit to appeal for gas heating.

"Gasification is not coming," said a resident of the town of Chernogorsk, 5 kilometers north of Abakan. "At least not in our lifetimes. They talk about such projects every year, since some election or another is always happening…. I know the process is complicated, but if it isn't going to happen, they shouldn't promise it."

A resident of the city of Krasnoyarsk agreed, noting the authorities have also been building a subway system in the city since 1995.

"You can see how they are 'building' us a metro and 'bringing' us gas," he said. "We are a city of 1 million people, a region that sends more money to Moscow than it takes. We are pumping gas to China, while we ourselves breathe coal smoke."

With reporting by RFE/RL's Russian Service*EDITOR'S NOTE: Some people in this story have not been identified to protect them due to Russia's labeling of RFE/RL as an " undesirable organization."



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1463132)6/17/2024 5:33:27 AM
From: IC720  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578284
 
The West wanting to conquer Russia for it's minerals/wealth has been going on at least a few hundred years...

"Make no mistake, this is a conquest agenda to strip Russia of all its assets. Napoleon and Hitler attempted the same for the same reasons. In 1917, Russia had the largest gold reserves EVER in the world. They hid them so the Communists would not get them. To this day, nobody knows where they are."

Lindsey Graham on the Real Reason Behind Ukraine (49s video)

What happened to the story that “Putin attacked Ukraine unprovoked, and Ukraine was just defending itself, etc”? Now, suddenly, the problem is the natural resources in Donbas, not Ukraine itself. The first victim in war is always the truth. These people have NEVER told the truth about any war EVER!!!!!!



I have stated before that there is a huge natural gas reserve under Crimea. All the Neocons are doing is constantly trying to conquer Russia and bankrupt it so they can invade, and it has been the same scenario constantly. Obama wanted to invade Syria, and Putin came to their aid. This was all about a pipeline they wanted to put through Syria to cut off Russian energy sales to Europe. The Neocons orchestrated the blowing up of Nord Stream. That undermined Germany and Europe – but as Victoria Nuland famously said, “ Fuck the EU.

The question of Palestinian reserves was confirmed back in 2019. I covered the gas reserves in Syria’s occupied Golan Heights in 2017 involving Genie Oil. Obama wanted to invade Syria all for pipelines. What the press reports never connects the dots. Obama was pushing for a pipeline through Syria to stop Russia from supplying energy to Europe. This has been a war against Russia for decades.

The Neocons after blowing up Nord Stream, promised to pay for a pipeline from Nigeria to Europe. When the Niger coup took place, that is why Victoria Nuland was on a plane to Niger. US taxpayers fund the Neocon dreams of war. We blow up Nord Stream and then pay for a pipeline from Nigeria. The deal with Nigeria was that they had to be the first Digital Currency guinea pig, and the US taxpayer would fund a pipeline from them to Europe to cut off energy sales from Russia.

Now, Lindsey Graham has come out and admitted that the “resources” under Crimea are worth $10 to $12 trillion, and this is again to stop Russia from gaining that natural gas.

As I said before, I was solicited to put in $10 billion to take over Russia back in 1999. I refused. The story was that I would earn 10x that amount. They were looking at the vast wealth of natural resources. Make no mistake, this is a conquest agenda to strip Russia of all its assets. Napoleon and Hitler attempted the same for the same reasons. In 1917, Russia had the largest gold reserves EVER in the world. They hid them so the Communists would not get them. To this day, nobody knows where they are.



Our sources are saying that the Ukrainian casualties, civilian and military, will most likely exceed 1 million. As I said before, nobody expected Ukraine to win. This has been all about weakening Russia, and then NATO will walk in. NOBODY cares anything about the Ukrainian people. This was not about protecting the poor Syrians from chemical weapons from the government. It was about a pipeline. It is always a lie.

I was in Japan when there was a huge protest against sending troops to the Gulf War. Japan, after WWII, was restricted, and its Constitution prohibited its troops from being more than 200 miles offshore. They could not send troops to Iraq, so those in power wanted to change the Constitution to be able to send troops. The people BLAMED their military, who always were also NEOCONS, for bringing Japan to destruction. All I ever heard was an apology for their government in WWII. One day, the West will wake up and come to the same conclusion. We are being betrayed by the enemies within. Our children will be sent to die for their personal hatred and goals of limitless wealth.

In his Face the Nation Interview, Lindsey Grahm said the same shit I was told back in 1999 – get Russia’s wealth. He said:

“It’s now time to give them the F-16s, let them fly the planes, long range artillery to hit targets inside of Russia. Go after Putin’s assets, wherever they’re at, all over the world. Go on the offensive. I think this summer, Ukraine will regain military momentum.”

….

“But what did Trump do to get the weapons flowing? He created a loan system. They’re sitting on 10 to $12 trillion of critical minerals in- in Ukraine. They could be the richest country in all of Europe. I don’t want to give that money and those assets to Putin to share with China. If we help Ukraine now, they can become the best business partner we ever dreamed of, that 10 to $12 trillion of critical mineral assets could be used by Ukraine and the West, not given to Putin and China. This is a very big deal how Ukraine ends. Let’s help them win a war we can’t afford to lose. Let’s find a solution to this war. But they’re sitting on a gold mine. To give Putin 10 or $12 trillion for critical minerals that he will share with China is ridiculous.”


Categories: War