Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1463651)	6/19/2024 7:07:51 PM
From: Wharf Rat	3 Recommendations Recommended By Doren pocotrader rdkflorida2 Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1577072

"His Eco-health funded gain of Function partnership with the bio-warfare Chinese military created it." Nope. BREAKING: Dr. Anthony Fauci condemns attacks against him over the origins of the COVID-19 virus, says, strong evidence suggests that it did not come from a lab in Wuhan, China, but from natural occurrence, says still, he keeps an open mind, says the NIH did the right thing by… pic.twitter.com/TVUbXP7eMj — Simon Ateba (@simonateba) June 18, 2024 ...What they say that's incorrect is that the NIH funded a grant in China, and through an indirect grant, funded a firm in New York that did a sub-award to do some surveillance studies on what is out there, which is a perfectly appropriate thing to do. In fact, I would probably be held as incompetent if we didn't do that. As it turns out, the viruses studied under the NIH grant are evolutionarily, or phylogenetically (a big word), so distant from SARS-CoV-2 that there's no chance in the world that someone could make that virus turn into SARS-CoV-2. So, this attack that we funded a project that turned into COVID is completely preposterous. Anybody who knows anything about virology will say that it's so distant that the precursor virus could not possibly turn into SARS-CoV-2, even if you tried.,