SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bull_dozer who wrote (206281)6/22/2024 2:52:37 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218841
 
believe Team China already informed Team WS, "thank you"



To: bull_dozer who wrote (206281)6/22/2024 7:29:40 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218841
 
Still not 100% gold and silver, meaning still agnostic

dailymail.co.uk

Historian warns America could face destruction because of controversial policy that both Biden and Trump have backed
05:32 BST 22 Jun 2024,
updated 09:20 BST 22 Jun 2024
By Dominic Yeatman For Dailymail.Com

America's status as the world's greatest power will end for the same reason as its predecessors - crushed by a mountain of debt that politicians find convenient to ignore, historians have warned.

AdvertisementAnd the United States' century at the top could be coming to an end quicker than expected with countries in Asia increasingly likely to pull the plug.

Interest payments on the debt overtook spending on defense earlier this month, but it will not be force of arms that brings the country down, according to historian Professor Niall Ferguson.

'Any great power that spends more on debt service than on defense will not stay great for very long,' he said in a piece he penned for Bloomberg, explaining a theory he calls Ferguson's Law.

'True of Habsburg Spain, true of ancien régime France, true of the Ottoman Empire, true of the British Empire. This law is about to be put to the test by the US beginning this very year.'


Harvard history professor Niall Ferguson warns that the US is facing the same decline from dominance that affected Spain, France and Britain before it

America's debt to GDP ratio fell during the 1990s to a low of low of 32 percent in 2001, but it is expected to reach an all-time high of 122 percent in the next ten years The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated this week that another $1.9 trillion will be added to the national debt this year alone, taking it to an eye-watering $36 trillion.

That is equal to the total value of goods and services produced by the US in the course of a year.

The rising cost of medicare and the bank rate surging to a 23-year high are among the factors likely to push it up to $56 trillion within the next ten years, according to the CBO, taking it to a record 122 percent of GDP.

And there seems little variation on this point between the two presidential contenders with both Joe Biden and Donald Trump having added $7 billion to the figure during their terms in office, according to the WSJ.

JH Cullum Clark, of the Bush Institute-Southern Methodist University Economic Growth Initiative, has studied the history of previous superpowers and sees unsettling parallels with America's current plight.

He says the pattern was established as far back as the Roman Empire when overspending tempted third century emperors to start debasing the currency, sparking endemic inflation which eventually destroyed its power to defend itself.

The wealth flowing in from the New World blinded Spain to its reliance on foreign lending to maintain its empire abroad and ending its dominance in the 17th century.

Eventually it 'managed to default seven times in the 19th century alone, after having defaulted six times in the preceding three centuries,' economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff wrote in their book This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly.


Yale Professor Paul Kennedy warns that China and other Asian countries now hold immense power over the US through their ownership of Treasury bonds

The Roman empire's hegemony was just the first to be ended by fiscal irresponsibility according to historian JH Cullum Clark, of the Bush Institute-Southern Methodist University Economic Growth Initiative

America's $34 trillion national debt is equal to $101,233 for every man, woman and child in the country, according to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation AdvertisementIt was France's turn 100 years later after a series of casual defaults, before Britain lost its place to the US in the 20th century, with debt rocketing during and immediately after the Second World War.

The British pound had been the international reserve currency between the wars, allowing it to finance its far-flung empire, but it decisively lost that status to the US dollar in the war's aftermath.

America's debt to GDP ratio fell during the prosperous 1990s, reaching a low of 32 percent in 2001.

But it has soared to 99 percent since then, powered upwards by the great recession of the 2010s and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic.

'The largest contributor to the cumulative increase was the incorporation of recently enacted legislation which added $1.6 trillion to projected deficits,' the CBO wrote in its report.

'That legislation included emergency supplemental appropriations that provided $95 billion for aid to Ukraine, Israel, and countries in the Indo-Pacific region.'

The world's need to buy the dollars used for international trade has shielded the US from its high debt levels, but their are increasing signs that its status as the world's reserve currency is under threat.

Credit rating agency Fitch downgraded the US debt rating from the highest rating of AAA to AA+ in August last year, citing 'a steady deterioration in standards of governance'.

And in November, agency Moody's warned that it could remove the Government's AAA rating, while slashing its outlook from stable to negative.

'Even if a country issues the leading reserve currency, even if a country is the dominant geopolitical power, that just doesn't bail countries out,' Cullum Clark told the WSJ.

Advertisement'They do lose that status.'

Yale historian Professor Paul Kennedy warns that Asian nations, including China hold vast quantities of US debt in the shape of Treasury bonds.

He said they now hold the power to trigger a seismic threat to America's status if they 'just decided for some reason of having a political quarrel with the US to dump vast amounts of Treasury's'.

'I have been asking my economist friends about this conundrum…of a very, very large and in some ways overextended great power being able to keep issuing more and more its of currency-denominated bonds without there being, shall we say, punishment for it,' he said.

His 1987 book The Rise and Fall of Great Powers helped focus politicians' attention on the dangers posed by debt, which bore fruit in the falling debt to GDP levels of the 1990s.

And other nations including Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Canada have also managed to haul down their spending on debt in recent years, despite the impact of the pandemic.


Joe Biden has added around $7tn to national debt during his time in office

Donald Trump has promised to renew his 2017 tax cuts if re-elected - at a cost of $5tn over 10 years

US national debt has reached a record high - hitting $34 trillion for the first time in history But the nation's debt has taken a back seat in the presidential race so far with Republicans promising tax cuts and Biden promising no federal tax increases for families making less than $400,000 a year.

Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts are due to expire next year but Biden has said he will extend at least some of them for low- and middle-income earners.

Trump himself has said they will all be extended if he returns to the White House, potentially costing another $5 trillion over 10 years.

'The harmful effects of higher interest rates fueling higher interest costs on a huge existing debt load are continuing,' said Michael Peterson, chief executive of the fiscal think tank the Peter G. Peterson Foundation.

'It's the definition of unsustainable.'



To: bull_dozer who wrote (206281)6/22/2024 9:26:14 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218841
 
re >> THE F*CKING F*CKS

... fear them not, for the protocol of DDGUEEmgU (dollar down, gold up, everything else might go up) should, theoretically, happen only suddenly, ala shock therapy, and hurt a lot but only for a bursting time, and in the meantime no domain shall allow own currency to go up against the dollar

given so and such, good news, that we still have time to gorge and stack, gold and silver, respective, and wait for payout on consolation prize

plenty of time to look forward to giddy gold delirium and silly silver alt-delirium

zerohedge.com

What Chinese AI Tells Us About The Semi Market
By Russell Clark of the Capital Flows and Asset Markets substack
[url=][/url]

Back in January I wondered if semiconductors were the new oil. The price action this year probably says yes. Just as the Soviet Union tried to cripple the US in the 1970s through helping organise an oil embargo, the US is trying to cripple China through creating a semiconductor embargo. The US “war” with China was always about keeping China as a smaller economy than the US. From that perspective, it has been a resounding success. In dollar terms Chinese GDP has declined last few years.

[url=][/url]

The problem with embargoes, is that they heavily motivate those suffering from them to initiate policies to counteract and insulate them from a future embargo. In the US, the oil embargo led to reforms that reduced domestic demand, as well as encouraged increased supply from sources other than the Middle East. The end result of all these reforms was that we eventually saw the collapse of the oil price from near USD40 a barrel to USD15. With collapsing oil revenues, Soviet Union went into decline and eventual collapse. The unintended consequences of policy is often called blowback, and for the Soviet Union and OPEC, it was the eventually collapse of oil prices.

[url=][/url]

Banning high end semiconductor exports to China was meant to cripple development of high end industries in China. There is little evidence of this. China has become the world’s biggest exporter of electric cars. When I look at reviews of Chinese EVs on TikTok, they make Tesla look extremely second-rate.

[url=][/url]

EVs are not the main use for high end semiconductors - low end semis which China has pre-existing expertise in are probably sufficient. For AI and LLM, the very high end GPUs that NVIDIA sell are necessary. Even without access to high end semiconductors, there is evidence that China was able to approximate high end semiconductor performance through very aggressive use of low end semiconductors. Hence AI has ended up boosting the demand for all semiconductors. This would explain the phenomenal performance of Philadelphia Semiconductor Index. The embargo is creating demand across the entire semi spectrum.

[url=][/url]

A big driver in demand for semis has been AI and training large language models (LLM). It has been widely reported that a LLM price war has broken out in China. It is hard to understand how this is possible. It would be like seeing a price war among plastic producers in the US in 1974, just as their major inputs were soaring in price. After paying £14.50 for a Pimm’s at the cricket, I am shocked to see anything have a price cut - let alone the 90% prices cuts we have seen below. Some Chinese AI is now pricing at a 99.8% discount to OpenAI’s GTP-4. Whether this is a useful comparison is hard to tell, given the restrictions on access to Chinese internet (otherwise there is a huge arbitrage opportunity).

[url=][/url]

In a fully open free trading market, I would suggest the price war in China would have negative implications for Nvidia. And it might well end up that way - showing that AI needs a huge consolidation before it can be profitable. But what it does show is that Chinese policy of breaking cartels and fostering competition is producing exactly the results you would expect - lower prices. In the US, Meta, Google, OpenAI and Microsoft look determined to create a lock on high end Nvidia chips to starve out competition.

Increasingly the blowback for US policy to try and slowdown China, has been to spur an even more competitive Chinese tech industry, while creating a domestic tech cartel, with increasingly uncompetitive products : the iPhone continues to charge high prices for out of date tech for example, TikTok was destroying Meta and Google, while Microsoft remains Microsoft, Tesla looks pedestrian. Huawei has begun building an ecosystem completely independent of US tech. It would be no surprise if that system will produce substantially cheaper products.

Combine this with US sanctions on Russian oil that has created a parallel financial system that cuts the US dollar out, it’s hard to escape the observation that US is making every single long term mistake possible. I am reminded of Japan in 1991, vaulting ambition just as it was losing competitiveness. The US now has vaulting ambition just as it was getting exposed on every single front. One very striking similarity is sky high golf club memberships. In Japan in 1991, golf club memberships were traded for millions of dollars. In the US, unlike Japan, there is no shortage of land, but USD 500,000 for a golf club membership does exist.

[url=][/url]

Unlike Japan, I expect the US dollar to take the brunt of decline in US industry. Our currency, your problem as the US government used to say - Switzerland is already showing the strain, having to cut rates even though they are already far below US rates. In a pro labour world, I thought growth would be strong, and higher rates would be the big problem for the market, but markets would flatline - and this has been true (outside of tech). But the more I look at the US, the more I think I maybe I wrong. Maybe we are headed to the greatest short selling market of all time - collapsing share prices AND amazing carry proceeds. Fun times - for short sellers anyway.



To: bull_dozer who wrote (206281)6/23/2024 4:08:52 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218841
 
Wasn’t May the month Team China central bank announced no gold adds?

PBOC may or may not have added gold, but …




To: bull_dozer who wrote (206281)6/24/2024 3:06:28 PM
From: bull_dozer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 218841
 
>> THE F*CKING F*CKS




To: bull_dozer who wrote (206281)7/11/2024 2:56:29 PM
From: bull_dozer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 218841