Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1465726)	7/2/2024 9:53:06 AM
From: Bill	1 Recommendation Recommended By Broken_Clock Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573683

Hey, the debate was over whether there was any immunity at all. You said no, I said yes. You were wrong, now you want to move the goalpost and focus on the grey area. That's fine. But be a man and admit your dismissive posts about the very possibility of immunity were WRONG WRONG WRONG. (And ignorant.) As for Trump, he will have to go back to the lower court to defend his actions as official acts. I think he can make a case for enforcing election integrity, but some of his actions (like organizing alternative slates of electors) probably fall outside his official duties. Did he break a law doing that? I have no idea.