Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (30641)	2/19/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

Richard, KJM is a promoter, what do you expect him to say that this specific Rothschild is a fake? I'll repeat the famous line from the old VP debate (Bensen-Qayle) " I knew a Rothschild once, and this one is no Rothschild". If this Rothschild wants to gain some credibility, than he might as well come forward with full disclosure, who is he, what is the outfit (we) that invested in those SA and Russian operations etc. Right now, to me, it is just very eloquent talk. Zeev

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (30641)	2/19/1998 3:55:00 PM
From: go4it	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

It appears to me that we have a reversal in the price today to the up side by looking at the one minute chart of today's trading. Can I please have a couple of the experienced TA people offer an opinion on this?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (30641)	2/20/1998 9:17:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

I see that Taylor has that "Rothschild" post on his update: miningstocks.com Does anyone have knowledge of the validity of the "Rothschild" post, or is this just some of the hype that hurts desert dirt credibility? Doubt serves my wallet much better than grasping at "tooth fairy" straws. I have asked a few times now about the validity of that post, but nobody has stepped up to validate it. I would suggest it's a forgery.

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (30641)	2/21/1998 9:35:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Zeev, I received the following email from KJM Capital. This information was posted on this thread a few days ago. To my knowledge, nobody has determined that this Rothschild is the "Rothschild". Things getting nutty, or what? Why do you have any reason to believe that a "real" Rothschild would be posting on Silicon Investor under his own name about IPM, and also say that they're buying shares of MG Gold? Isn't this just absolutely wonderful news, too good to true? I believe that it's BS and that if the "real" Rothschild knew he were being impersonated by a stock promoter that there'd be hell to pay.