Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (206843)	7/18/2024 3:19:51 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Recommended By SpedeReder Respond to of 219615

Fusion for electricity. 38 years ago, in our BP research and development budgets we had many £millions allocated to fusion. And BP Solar was big in photovoltaics. But there still no fusion. It's not a matter of dollars and whatnot, like so many things is a matter of cognitive concepts. Cold fusion and con fusion have not succeeded. My theory is that large Hadron collider scale energy in dirty great magnetic field torus tokamak tractors is to much like dumb brute force. Similarly launching rockets with kilotons of exhaust power seems a dumb brute force method of overcoming gravity. With cute little spin reversal systems in quarks, hadrons, bosons and whatnot, a 200kg pressurized flying saucer could zip up to 50km, accelerate to 5,000 km per hour and get from here to there in a couple of hours. Maybe the energy could be from a fusion reactor. I better get my prototype going before the competitors. Mqurice