Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dj55 who wrote (1470481)	7/18/2024 6:27:51 PM
From: golfer72	2 Recommendations Recommended By Broken_Clock longz Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575179

Did you read the comments ?: 1) "This is a regurgitation of the false NIST report. It is impossible for WTC7 to have collapsed like this or because of fire. Something very suspicious happened with WTC7. Check out the University of Alaska study instead". 2) " This building was 610 feet tall with a foot print about the size of a football field. It had 82 columns each weighing over 900#/foot. It collapsed into its own foot print in 7 seconds. It was in free fall for over 2 seconds. Do you really think that this was a progressive collapse like dominos falling after one column buckled?"