Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1471490)	7/22/2024 2:36:12 PM
From: Bill	3 Recommendations Recommended By Broken_Clock FJB longz Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1576660

Tench, you can't make obviously false statements like that without being challenged. If you had read Cannon's 93-page ruling, you would know she acknowledged the fact that prior special counsels appointed under the special statutory authority of the Independent Counsels Act were legal. But that Act expired and was not renewed or replaced. So all principal officer appointments, like Smith, must be made in accordance with Article II Section 2. This requirement was ignored by AG Garland. Now, I know law is not your forte, but you CAN read. Try doing it.