SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bull_dozer who wrote (207066)7/26/2024 10:11:11 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217576
 
re <<physical>>

... not funny hereunder, and expecting to be quite inflationary, just-saying

... looking like culprits are all over the place, making it obvious that lengthening and contorting supply chain is an un-good idea
... British distributor ... The planemaker has since asked its supply chain to confirm their paperwork is legitimate after the company reviewed certificates of conformance from China not recognised as authentic by the original Chinese manufacturer ...

scmp.com

Boeing asks suppliers for Chinese titanium records, as check for forgeries widens
Published: 3:51am, 27 Jul 2024



Boeing 737 MaX aircraft are assembled at the company’s plant in Renton, Washington, on Thursday. Photo: Reuters

Boeing is asking suppliers to disclose records on Chinese titanium since 2014, according to a letter seen by Reuters, as the US planemaker widens checks for false paperwork used to authenticate the metal used in commercial aircraft.

Regulators said in June they were investigating whether false or incorrect documents were used to identify the authenticity of titanium used for parts in some Boeing and Airbus planes.

Airbus said it is collaborating with authorities and investigating the lack of proper traceability affecting a small number of titanium parts from suppliers to programmes like the A220, A320 and A350.

Reports of forged documentation initially raised concerns about the structural integrity of some aircraft, but planemakers and suppliers say the correct titanium alloy was used and their products are safe.

Paper trails are critical in aviation, where regulators insist on clear documentation for even minor production changes to assure planes are safe.

Boeing Max plane grounded globally after mid-air blowout leaving hole the size of a door

“In the interest of full compliance, we are now broadening the scope of our request,” Boeing wrote in the letter sent in mid-July to suppliers that asks for details by August 9.

A weekly curated round-up of social, political and economic stories from China and how they impact the world.

It is not clear why Boeing is asking suppliers to provide records for Chinese titanium purchases dating back a decade.

While the impact of the industry-wide issue is extremely limited for Boeing, the company said it is “continuing to work with our suppliers to ensure that every titanium part is properly documented”.

Aerospace-grade titanium’s strength and light weight make it ideal for components that take the heaviest punishment, like engine parts and landing gear for big planes. Titanium supply has been tight due to demand for planes and as Western nations seek alternatives to metal from Russia and China.

Boeing has been under scrutiny all year following the January 5 mid-air blowout of a door panel on a new 737 Max 9. The required documents detailing the removal of that key part for repairs have not been located and Boeing believes they were never created.

Last year, jet engine manufacturer CFM International disclosed that thousands of its engine components might have been sold with falsified documentation by a British distributor.



The top half of a 737 aircraft is seen at Boeing’s Foundational Training Centre in Renton, Washington, on Thursday. Photo: Reuters

Joe Buccino, spokesman for Boeing supplier Spirit AeroSystems, said the company will comply with the planemaker’s letter, which Boeing confirmed.

“Documentation compliance is critical in the aviation industry,” Buccino said.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said the investigation is ongoing. The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) was not immediately available for comment.

Boeing asked suppliers in February to disclose whether they had procured the metal through distributor Titanium International Group (TIG) since January 2019.

In June, The New York Times reported that TIG noticed that the material looked different from previous supplies and determined that paperwork accompanying the titanium seemed inauthentic.

The planemaker has since asked its supply chain to confirm their paperwork is legitimate after the company reviewed certificates of conformance from China not recognised as authentic by the original Chinese manufacturer.



A United Airlines Boeing 757-200. File photo: Shutterstock

Wheel falls from United Airlines Boeing plane during take-off in Los Angeles

A Boeing jetliner taking off from Los Angeles lost a wheel, the latest in a string of safety scares for the aerospace giant.

United Airlines, which operated the Boeing 757-200, said the plane lost the wheel on Monday after leaving Los Angeles International Airport but landed safely in Denver, its intended destination.

“The wheel has been recovered in Los Angeles, and we are investigating what caused this event,” the airline said in statement.

No injuries were reported from the ground or the 174 passengers and seven crew members on board.

It was the second time in recent months that a Boeing plane operated by United Airlines lost a wheel after taking off.

In March, a United Airlines Boeing 777 bound for Japan had a tire fall off shortly after take-off from San Francisco. The aircraft had to make an emergency landing.

In January, a Boeing 757 operated by Delta Air Lines lost its nose wheel while preparing for take-off at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport in Atlanta.

The most pressing stories and in-depth analysis from the Asia region, sent to you each week.

Delta said a nose gear tire and rim had come loose and then rolled down a hill. Passengers had to exit the plane, but no one was injured.

Boeing agreed Monday to plead guilty to fraud in a settlement with the US Department of Justice over two fatal 737 Max crashes.

Boeing has faced renewed scrutiny of the 737 Max this year after a fuselage door plug blew out on the same model during an Alaska Airlines flight in January.

A Boeing spokesperson said in an email that the 757-200 aircraft that took off Monday was first delivered 30 years ago in 1994.



To: bull_dozer who wrote (207066)7/27/2024 12:32:23 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Arran Yuan

  Respond to of 217576
 
Have this day, Saturday, loaded more crypto ETH crypto and crypto PAXG gold, calling out the week's correction as BS.

hereunder from behind ZeroHedge premium paywall

spoiler:
Stay Long Gold

Macro conditions remain bullish for gold with peak rates, growth slowing and central bank demand remaining robust. Gold also provides good hedging value against geopolitical shocks and we maintain our $2700 price target for 2025 ( here).

zerohedge.com

What Just Happened In Markets: Goldman's Desk Answers The Top 7 Trader Questions

At the end of another rollercoaster week for markets, Goldman's Lindsay Matcham answers the 7 top questions asked by the bank's trading clients. Below we excerpt from the Macro Questions note, detailing Goldman's views on the most prevalent market topics (the full note is available to pro subscribers in the usual place), which are the following:

  • What Just Happened In Markets & Why Did We Sell Off?
  • Does Bad News Still Mean Good News?
  • A Healthy Pull Back Or Something More Sinister?
  • What’s The Biggest Concern For Macros Right Now?
  • What’s The Most Talked About Macro Thematic Basket This Week?
  • Where Are The Macro Opportunities/Trades Right Now?
  • What’s The Latest In Crude?
Taking a closer look at these one by one:

What Just Happened In Markets & Why Did We Sell Off?

Risk Off Not Unexpected

We have been feeling more bearish for a while, with growth slowing and financial conditions still very tight, the market has been on look-out for what might break. Add to this the complacency that’s in the market with the “summer of carry” (credit spreads tight, VIX grinding lower, the cost of SPX protection on the floor), positioning stretched and seasonals poor.

Why Did We Sell Off?

China’s price action has been poor recently after some bad GDP prints and its started to spill over into the broader macro complex. There has been a change in narrative in the US from hot and higher for longer to disinflation and growth worries. The move lower in yields and expected lower cost of capital incoming led to the rotation out of large tech and into small caps which was the worst 5 day streak of large caps over small caps since 2020 ( here and here).

Odds of a Trump victory have also been moving lower which helped add to the risk off over the last few days. A Trump victory should benefit stock prices given his inflationary policies, pressure on the FED to cut rates and weaken the USD along with his deficit spending.

China pricing had started to spill over into other markets post the poor China GDP numbers: CSI 300 vs NDX below:

[url=][/url]

Markets had liked the increasing odds of a Trump victory. Markets sold off as those odds moved lower:

[url=][/url]

Add to this carry unwinds; all of which have knocked markets.

[url=][/url]

Does Bad News Still Mean Good News?

Bad news used to be good news with inflation worries front and center of investors’ minds; bad news meant potential cuts which was risk asset friendly. Yesterday was the first time for a while that hot data was cheered by markets. QoQ PCE came in hot and QoQ GDP was strong and yields and equities moved higher post the data.

This is testament to a market now more concerned with disinflation and growth with runaway inflation no longer a main concern for markets with breakevens well anchored. Bad news is no longer good news, good news is good news imo.

A Healthy Pull Back Or Something More Sinister?

It feels to me as though the rotation and momentum/carry unwind caused a risk off event rather than something more underlying and worrisome.

Our Momentum basket was our worst performing macro thematic basket yesterday down -2.23%. Essentially the trades that had worked stopped working across assets which included gold and USDJPY and as we sold off yesterday Russell’s outperformance of Nasdaq also continued. Would we have seen gold down and Russell outperforming Nasdaq in a real growth slowdown risk off event? No.

As momentum sold off, US GDP numbers came in solid which illustrates a momentum unwind vs anything more serious to worry about. Having said that, we shifted neutral equities (from overweight) in our 3m global asset allocation ( here) and like hedging into the summer on growth slowdown, US election risk and market concentration (here).

Yesterday Russell (white) outperformed the Nasdaq (blue) again and gold sold off (orange):

[url=][/url]

Our Momentum Basket has underperformed recently:

[url=][/url]

What’s The Biggest Concern For Macros Right Now?

China Growth

Global growth and markets need China to perform and that’s not really happening right now. China remains in a balance sheet recession with inflation continuing to decline and GDP continuing to disappoint. The market wants fiscal stimulus and continues to fade rate cuts which the PBoC delivered again yesterday.

China rates just hit all time lows as the PBoC continues to cut rates in order to try and stimulate:

[url=][/url]

From Hot & Higher For Longer Into Growth Slowdown & Cuts Incoming

A few months ago the no cuts to even potential hikes chat was gaining traction. Cuts have moved from x7 at the beginning of the year to x1 at the end of April and now back down to almost x3 for the rest of the year.

Hatzius came out with his latest Why Wait? ( here) arguing a rationale for a July cut given the direction of growth, inflation and unemployment. What’s on the mind of macros now is if this growth slowdown turns into a recessionary slowdown with the bulls saying private sector debt is small in this cycle (its all fiscal debt) vs the bears saying with rates so high for so long something is bound to break soon.

US cuts priced for this year:

[url=][/url]

Election Risks

Markets aren’t sure how to play the upcoming election. Odds of a Trump victory had moved up to 70% with Trump trades in full steem; our Republican basket was outperforming and the Trump steepener began making moves.

However Trumps odds of winning have now dropped to 57% at time of writing post Harris stepping into the race and Democrats’ odds of winning have edged up slightly (here). Republican sweep odds have moved lower.

We are still confident that a Trump victory means a stronger USD (here) but the USD has been selling off as more cuts get priced and inflation moves lower. Tariffs would be inflationary but Volatility has failed to pick up (until the recent sell off).

The negative spillover effects on other economies is also now a real concern; with the 10% proposed tariffs on all imports to the US being a key risk with our economists estimating that it could take out 1% from Euro area GDP ( here). European PMIs yesterday weren’t good and as such we have downgraded our European GDP estimates ( here).

Our Republican Policy Pair Basket:

[url=][/url]

Carry Unwinds

Carry can be a problem; as markets grind higher, investors sell Vol pocketing premium which moves Vol lower in a feedback loop that stretches positioning causing overcrowding and unwind risk.

In a drawdown carry players can lose their YTD PnL in a day; just look at the moves in USDJPY and MXNJPY. With positioning in carry so stretched, once these trades are unwound it adds to Vol and price action on the downside.

The best illustration of the carry trade is MXNJPY...

[url=][/url]

... and USDJPY:

[url=][/url]

What’s The Most Talked About Macro Thematic Basket This Week?

Surprise surprise its election and tariff focused. With confusion around cross asset performance its pretty clear in equity land what should outperform/underperform under the surface and we like the tariff play in Europe via our Short EU Tariff Exposed Names Basket {GSXETRFS Index}.

Most European cyclicals with large US sales have factories in the US, thus out of scope of incremental tariffs, which is why we have built this basket. It is composed of European stocks producing in Europe, with factories in Europe, then shipping goods into the US and in scope of tariffs.

[url=][/url]

Where Are The Macro Opportunities/Trades Right Now?

US Election Vol Risk Premium Through The V2X Sep/Oct/Nov Fly

Jan highlighted the implications of higher tariffs here and the desk has been fielding lots of incoming from clients about how to trade the upcoming US elections. In short, we think this will be a significant vol event and we are anticipating an increase in client hedging over the coming months.

Buy DAX Downside To Protect Against Tariff Risks Given Global Growth Exposure

The DAX is heavily geared towards global growth, and for those looking to protect against increased tariff rhetoric put spreads out to December look good here

UK Upside For The Bulls

Worth noting that FTSE upside calls once again trade on an extremely low vol handle. Value can outperform into a BoE (and global) cutting cycle and it's one of the few countries with an absolute majority party in power. Cheap way to rent delta for a bounceback (Thilo Deller)

Indicatively: FTSE Sep24 102% Call costs 90bps [32-delta | 10v]

Despite the recent spike Vol is still at very low levels historically, V2X vs VIX below:

[url=][/url]

SPX Lower/USDCNH higher

Granted with the sell off that just occurred SPX moved lower and USDCNH didn’t go higher, however on a proper risk off event the USD should act as a safe haven and the trade also protects you against a China wobble at the same time. Long USDCNH is also positive carry.

SPX vs USDCNH:

[url=][/url]

US2S10S Steepener

The trade is now working and should continue to work if Trump wins and or Powell starts cutting in the front in a bull steepening scenario. A pick up in Vol will help. More on it here

[url=][/url]

BTP/Bund Spreads / Wider Credit Spreads

As part of the carry trade and complacency in the market credit spreads are very tight. Unfortunately for investors credit spreads don’t tend to blow out until after the fact so they can be misleading. We think there is more scope for widening in the near term.

[url=][/url]

Stay Long Gold

Macro conditions remain bullish for gold with peak rates, growth slowing and central bank demand remaining robust. Gold also provides good hedging value against geopolitical shocks and we maintain our $2700 price target for 2025 ( here).


[url=][/url]

What’s The Latest In Crude?

Oil Downside To Hedge For A Tail Negative Outcome & Potential Trump Tariffs

Crude remains range bound and has recently sold off to the lower end of our $75-$90 range on concerns around China demand which is below our expectations ( here).

There are downside risks to our forecasts as a result of potential Trump policies; we think tariffs could hit 2025 oil prices by $11 as a result of weaker GDP and oil demand in a scenario where the US imposes an across-the-board tariff of 10% on goods imports.

Our estimated tariffs hit to oil prices rises to $19/bbl in a scenario where the Fed delays cut beyond 2025 due to higher core inflation but moderates to $6/bbl if the Fed doesn't delay cuts and OPEC+ reverses its announced supply increases.

Dec 60 Brent puts around 0.35 are a cheap convexity hedge for a tail negative outcome ( here). Time spreads have been indicative of a healthier market vs flat price action:

[url=][/url]

More in the full note available to pro subs in the usual place.



To: bull_dozer who wrote (207066)7/27/2024 12:53:43 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217576
 
Re <<"only few will make it to the top of K2">>

... only fewer-still will make it to the top of K2.7

Spoiler:
To answer that question, we look at the latest note out of Goldman which analyzes Chinese gold demand to conclude that a $2,700 year-end price forecast for gold is appropriate.

from behind ZeroHedge paywall

zerohedge.com

Goldman Expects Gold To Surge On Relentless Chinese Demand

BY TYLER DURDEN

TUESDAY, JUL 23, 2024 - 07:45 PM

Back in December 2022, with gold trading below $1800/oz, we first discussed the beginning of a precious metal buying-binge from China which as we noted then had emerged as the "Mystery" massive gold buyer after its first official purchase in three years, and noted that the price for physical gold had never been more expensive at the time (while western gold prices were still below their prior record highs). Additionally we noted a curious divergence between the apparent lack of demand for so-called 'paper gold' via ETFs as holdings underlying these vehicles was declining, coupled with a gold price that seemed to have disconnected from ETF holdings and was driven instead by physical demand, or as we noted "the rising interest in gold bars and coins was primarily driven by investors’ safe-haven demand, supported by global geopolitical instability and weak performance of investment products denominated in Chinese yuan.”

[url=][/url]

In retrospect, not only did we bottom tick the price of gold, which hit a five year low right around the time of our December 2022 article predicting China's relentless buying, but in the 18 months since, the yellow metal has risen by 40%, a staggering appreciation for an asset which is best known for its boring stability.

We bring this up for three reasons:

  • First, the gold price set a new all-time high of $2,483/toz on Wednesday (July 17) as expected Fed cuts are poised to bring Western capital back into the gold market: see that little kink in the black line in the chart above? That means the constant gold ETF selling since 2020 is finally over.
  • Second, besides rising interest from Western investors, demand from central banks is now structurally higher
  • And third, as Goldman writes in a research note published on Monday and picking up where we started almost two years ago, third major component of global gold demand - Chinese households - is likely to keep demand for physical gold elevated for the foreseeable future.
There is another reason why the ongoing surge in gold is remarkable: as we have noted on multiple occasions, gold prices have rallied since mid-2022 despite sharp increases in US real interest rates, which traditionally predict falling gold prices...

[url=][/url]

... and again, we have relentless demand out of China to thank for this.

So what is it is about gold that China is suddenly so enamored by it, its demand surpassing that of long-time gold champion India?

To answer that question, we look at the latest note out of Goldman which analyzes Chinese gold demand to conclude that a $2,700 year-end price forecast for gold is appropriate.

Below we excerpt from the Goldman note, starting with a primer of China’s gold market, which accounts for about one-third of total global physical demand. We then model Chinese gold demand based on measures of fear and income/wealth, as well as Chinese interest rates and gold prices. Finally, we show that although cyclical gold demand is soft due to price sensitivity, structural changes leave China gold demand roughly intact on net because the demand boost from fear and lower rates roughly offsets the hit from reduced income growth.

China’s Gold Market OverviewChina’s strong tradition of physical gold ownership and easy access to physical gold keep it as the dominant form of demand. Although gold-backed ETFs are gaining traction in China, their market size remains tiny compared to Western counterparts

[url=][/url]

Physical Gold demandWe can track (private) physical gold demand by tracking withdrawals from the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) because it is a centralized closed market. Nearly all physical gold transactions are routed through the SGE due to its high liquidity, regulation, and tax incentives.

[url=][/url]

An exception is the official sector, including the PBoC, that operates outside of the SGE and purchases gold directly on the international markets which provide the necessary liquidity for large transactions and allow payment in foreign currencies — unlike the SGE’s Renmimbi-only contracts.

China’s central bank has reported 18 consecutive months of gold purchases starting in November 2022, accumulating 317 tonnes. We have also shown that EM central banks have tripled their central bank buying since mid-2022 due to fears of US financial sanctions and concerns about US sovereign debt, with most buying now unreported. Despite a break in China’s reported purchases for May and June, the reality is that EM central banks, including China, will continue to frequently buy gold, disclosed or not.

[url=][/url]

SupplyChina gold supply originates from three sources: (1) non-monetary imports in ordinary trade (1007 tonnes in 2023), its primary source of supply, (2) scrap, and (3) domestic mine production from the world’s largest producer at roughly 400 tonnes annually. Gold destined for China’s domestic private market is routed through the SGE and must meet stringent quality standards, being melted and cast in SGE-approved refineries before being supplied.

[url=][/url]

DemandAccording to figures released by the China Gold Association, Chinese physical demand comprises about 40% in jewelry, 20% in bars and coins, and 5% in industrial fabrication, which together make up wholesale demand, with the remainder allocated to net investment . The next chart shows that Chinese gold demand — as tracked by monthly SGE withdrawals — has receded from its January peak and is down 16% (3MMA, YoY) in June.

[url=][/url]

Supply and Demand Clear (Mostly) LocallyDue to the relatively insular nature of the Chinese gold market, local and international prices can diverge, with the difference known as the Shanghai-London premium or discount. Given China’s strict export restrictions, any excess supply that induces a discount is ultimately absorbed by increased domestic demand. Conversely, supply shortages induce a premium such that either it destructs demand or it encourages an influx of scrap supply. The supply shortages can also be resolved by increased imports, which in turn can impact international prices. However, import adjustments are not a guaranteed solution, as Chinese authorities closely monitor gold inflows through quarterly import quotas, though adjustable based on market conditions. In 2023H2, gold import restrictions tightened, and the local premium reached more than $120/toz on September 14, 2023.

Fear, Income, Yields and Prices Drive Chinese Gold DemandGoldman models Chinese gold demand based on measures of fear, income, Chinese interest rates, and gold prices. The model regresses year-over-year growth in Chinese physical demand — after taking the 3 month moving average (3MMA) —on the consumer confidence index, the China Current Activity Indicator (12MMA) of economic growth, the level of Chinese real interest rates, and year-over-year growth in the Shanghai gold price. The bank finds that fear (measured as low consumer confidence), income/wealth (i.e. our China Current Activity Indicator), low China interest rates, and low gold prices all boost China gold demand significantly. As Exhibit 7 (Left) shows, the model explains the swings in Chinese gold demand pretty well.

Notably, Goldman finds that the Chinese market is particularly price sensitive; the bank estimates that a 10% drop in the Shanghai gold price would boost physical China gold demand by 16%

[url=][/url]

Cyclically Soft, Structurally Intact

This model also explains the swings in Chinese gold demand over the past 15 years. Goldman finds that rapid economic growth drove the surge in gold demand in 2010. During the pandemic, high international gold prices and weak economic activity led to a 27% year-over-year drop in demand, as price-sensitive Chinese consumers curtailed discretionary spending on gold jewelry (down 27% YoY).

While Chinese gold demand is now cyclically soft due to price sensitivity and recent price surges, structural changes leave China gold demand roughly intact on net because the demand hit from lower trend GDP growth (income/wealth) is roughly offset by the boost from lower interest rates and lower confidence (fear) due to property woes and economic uncertainties.

[url=][/url]

Goldman also finds further evidence of this price sensitivity in the recent demand shift across gold categories: Gold jewelry purchases declined 3% YoY in 2024 Q1 as consumers cut back on discretionary spending, while demand for the more cost-effective bars and coins surged 27% YoY. Additionally, a tripling in gold-related search activity on Baidu hints at robust latent demand, and hypothetical large price declines would likely reinvigorate Chinese buying.

[url=][/url]

Putting it all together, Goldman's analysts say that they "still see very significant value in long gold positions" and maintain their bullish $2,700 forecast (+12% vs. spot) for 2025 for three reasons:

  • First, they believe that the tripling in central bank purchases since mid-2022 on fears about US financial sanctions and US sovereign debt is structural.
  • Second, Fed rate cuts are poised to bring Western capital back into the gold market.
  • Third, gold offers significant hedging value to portfolios against geopolitical shocks including tariffs, Fed subordination risk, and debt fears.
That said, the finding that the particularly price sensitive Chinese market is digesting the price rally and already elevated CFTC gold positioning point to some risk that gold reaches Goldman's $2,700 target later than the bank's 2024 year-end baseline. However, this same price sensitivity also insures against hypothetical large price declines, which would likely reinvigorate Chinese buying.

More in the full Goldman note available to pro subscribers in the usual place.