Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (294589)	7/28/2024 8:42:50 PM
From: Lane3	1 Recommendation Recommended By Steve Lokness Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 353906

But it seems to me a cogent argument is to try to solve the problem, rather than leave children fatherless (or motherless, if that is the case)... The point is not whether or not it's better to keep families together under those circumstances. That's a detail TBD. The point is whether it's the federal government's business to legislate and administer a program to fix the alleged problem of women failing to breed up to the level he/it deems appropriate. It's part of the movement to produce more babies, the most prominent component of which is outlawing abortion and birth control. All of which is intrusive and antithetical to individual liberty. I may have missed the big picture somewhere Indeed.