SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MIKenn who wrote (17684)2/19/1998 2:28:00 PM
From: the Druid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
The ONLY reason that Compaq is trading at 35-1/2 today is that
all the sellers and all the buyers agree that this is a fair price
based upon all of the information that is available to the public
today.


How can we argue with such a true statement?



To: MIKenn who wrote (17684)2/19/1998 3:12:00 PM
From: Joe Antol  Respond to of 97611
 
KQB: Just to re-enforce one point you made. NYSE does "not" have MM's
they have "specialists" (different). Nasdaq has the MM's.
Good analysis.
Mr. CEO we need you to speak to the masses!
Thank you.
Joe...



To: MIKenn who wrote (17684)2/19/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Respond to of 97611
 
MIKenn - I'm not suggesting anything, Zalesky and many others keep making this statement over and over again on thread after thread. I really have no idea if this is occurring or not, and I'm sure you and others have a much better idea of how it works than I do!! As for CPQ, if you believe that the bucks are in the enterprise and that CPQ is setting itself up to go after more of them, then the stock should reflect that (eventually <gggg>). I don't have any more info than most on this thread, just trying to put the story together in my head using my knowledge of enterprise computing. It's worked for me at least once, (loading up on IBM when it tanked back in the 1993 timeframe). EP has a good track record, but it's obvious that in the short term the market is focusing on a possible 'merger hangover', and thus the stock has not made the progress many of us would like, at least in compaison to Dell, which certainly has. On the other hand, CPQ has not been unduly punished and has gone up after the big announcement. Compare that to what has occurred with CA's stock after the CSC announcement....

John



To: MIKenn who wrote (17684)2/19/1998 8:17:00 PM
From: Dulane U. Ponder  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 97611
 
I'm unclear as to where your information comes from. I would like to know why you differ with every large brokerage, hedge fund manager and specialist firm that speaks to the contrary. It is well known that stock prices are manipulated re options expiration and that this is a legal strategy of those who can afford to buy and sell 25,000 share blocks and larger to protect their positions. I'm sorry if I seem short tempered but the manipulation exists and it is LEGAL. dp



To: MIKenn who wrote (17684)2/20/1998 3:45:00 PM
From: Dulane U. Ponder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
I hope you are not referring to my comments about options expirations since I never referred to "manipulation" in the illegal sense, nor did I make mention of cpq or of market makers which as you say do not operate on the NYSE. dp