Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Young and Older Folk Portfolio -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dan1944 who wrote (7216)	8/1/2024 12:40:11 PM
From: SeeksQuality	1 Recommendation Recommended By chowder Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21887

Not quite that simple... First, chocolate competes with other confectionaries, including those that are not cocoa based. (Of course you could argue that Hershey's chocolate isn't exactly cocoa based either -- just 10% cocoa if I'm not mistaken.) Second, even when prices ARE going up across the industry, actually implementing those price increases can take a year or longer. If you rise them sharply you lose customers. The usual practice is to increase the base price, then engage in heavy discounting for a few months that eventually tapers off. You want to convince your customers that despite paying more, they are still getting a bargain, and that can be a hard sell! Third, there are sometimes contracts that interfere with the ability to increase pricing. Looking at the quarterly report (I usually don't bother), there was a sharp decrease in Q2 from inventory reduction. Earnings are booked when the product is manufactured. If sales are weak (or weaker than expected), then the inventory builds up. It appears that both the company and retailers were "right sizing" their inventory in Q2, however this is not expected to be a factor going forward. Sales are weak, but still estimated for ~2% growth on the year. Earnings are down on margin compression, largely from increased cocoa costs. Despite this massive hit to earnings, their $1.27 non-GAAP earnings basically covers the dividend. They aren't in any real danger, either operationally or financially, and ought to be able to soldier through these issues.