SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (59552)8/1/2024 9:23:54 PM
From: Johnny Canuck  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69786
 



TECH POLICY

Intel, eyed for billions in U.S. grants, will fire 15,000 workers
The layoff announcement by one of the nation’s largest chip makers is a setback for the Biden administration’s campaign to revitalize U.S. chip manufacturing.

3 min



Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger at the White House in January 2022. (Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post)





By Eva Dou


August 1, 2024 at 8:23 p.m. EDT

Chip maker Intel said Thursday that it plans to lay off 15,000 people, a troublingsign for the Biden administration’s multibillion-dollar plan to rebuild the U.S. chip manufacturing industry.

The layoffs will affect more than 15 percent of its workforce, Intel said. The announcement came as Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger told investors and staff that the company needed a massive restructuring to slash costs after posting a $1.6 billion loss in thesecondquarter.

Get a curated selection of 10 of our best stories in your inbox every weekend.

Intel’s annual revenue fell by $24 billion from 2020 through 2023 even as its workforce grew 10 percent, a trend that Gelsinger called unsustainable.“This is painful news for me to share,” he wrote in a note to employees.

The majority of the layoffs will be completed by the end of the year, Intel said.

Other companies have surpassed Intel in multiple areas over the past several years. The company failed to establish itself in mobile devices as smartphones took off in the 2000s, started losing ground in PCs and data centers to Advanced Micro Devices in the late 2010s, and now trails far behind Nvidia in the red-hot artificial intelligence sector.

But those Intel rivals mostly have their chips manufactured overseas, largely by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Intel had emerged as the big winner of President Biden’s Chips for America program, with the administration announcing $8.5 billion in grants and $11 billion in loans for the company this year to help bring some manufacturing operations back to the United States.

But Intel has yet to receive those funds, and a Commerce Department spokesperson declined to say whether Thursday’s announcement would affect the grants. When announcing the $8.5 billion grants for Intel in March, the department had called it a “non-binding preliminary” agreement, with completion of a due diligence process required for the funds to be released.

??
Follow Technology

Follow

Intel previously estimated that its new U.S. factories would create 10,000 manufacturing jobs and 20,000 construction jobs.

The job cuts are part of a plan to cut $10 billion in costs in 2025.

Intel also plans to winnow the number of products it makes; stop “non-essential work”; and suspend its dividend, starting in the fourth quarter.

Semiconductors have become a renewed policy focus in Washington amid an intensified U.S.-China rivalry. Chips are the brains of all computing devices, from mobile phones to super computers and smart weapons, and U.S. officials have become alarmed that so much of the American supply is produced in East Asia.

The Biden-backed Chips and Science Act of 2022, which allocates $52 billion in grants and $75 billion in loans to support the domestic chip industry, has been praised by U.S. executives as transformative, with Gelsinger calling it “the most important piece of industrial policy since World War II.”

But there have also been skeptics. Chips are a notoriously brutal industry, requiring billions of dollars of investments. Even if Intel ultimately gets federal money for expansion, its U.S.-based factories will continue to face higher labor costs than peers in South Korea, Taiwan and China.

Gelsinger said in March that Biden was pushing him to get the new federally funded factories up and running faster, and that Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo “now has sales targets for me.”

Intel’s stock was down 19 percent to $23.54 in after-hours trading Thursday.

Share

Comments



By Eva Dou

Eva Dou is a Washington-based reporter covering technology policy for the Washington Post. A Detroit native who studied journalism at the University of Missouri, she reported on business and politics in Asia for a decade. She is the author of the forthcoming book House of Huawei: The Secret History of China's Most Powerful Company. Twitter

Sign up

Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan ?


MOST READ TECHNOLOGY


TOP STORIES



Technology
Big Tech news and how to take control of your data and devices


Analysis|Tech group asks Trump to clarify Section 230 stance



Our first taste of ‘Apple Intelligence’ is here. Here’s what works.




Election 2024 live updates: Democratic delegates begin online voting to nominate Harris




back
Try a different topic

Sign in or create a free account to save your preferences

MOST READ



Company
About The Post Newsroom Policies & Standards Diversity & Inclusion Careers Media & Community Relations WP Creative Group Accessibility Statement Sitemap

Get The Post
Become a Subscriber Gift Subscriptions Mobile & Apps Newsletters & Alerts Washington Post Live Reprints & Permissions Post Store Books & E-Books Today’s Paper Public Notices

Contact Us
Contact the Newsroom Contact Customer Care Contact the Opinions Team Advertise Licensing & Syndication Request a Correction Send a News Tip Report a Vulnerability

Terms of Use
Digital Products Terms of Sale Print Products Terms of Sale Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Settings Submissions & Discussion Policy RSS Terms of Service Ad Choices

washingtonpost.com © 1996-2024 The Washington Post

0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%