Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: angel who wrote (2477)	2/19/1998 3:49:00 PM
From: Tech Master	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3391

angel- >>> Then these companies get pilot projects and ask CSGI to do them and CSGI does not get the job done. <<< I heard a rumor that this was the reason for the changes at Agiss... Could it be? Did you hear the same thing? How big are the salaries of these new VP's? HUGE I'm sure... so much for the low overhead..... Just wondering, Tech Master

To: angel who wrote (2477)	2/19/1998 4:30:00 PM
From: tech	Respond to of 3391

Better, but your posts are still inaccurate and misleading. The Strategia agreement was only to be exclusive for BULL language. Not anything else. They signed the Agiss exclusivity based on volume of work Agiss was going to bring in. Also, the exclusivity is not for ALL of Canada since INSI, CSGI's other partner, is also in Canada. Since Agiss has not brought in the work they promised, the exclusive portion should be terminated. Giving Agiss exclusivity in Canada, without making Agiss agree to ONLY use ConSygen, was a mistake and should of never have been done. However, Agiss hasn't given that much work to anyone. From what I understand, Agiss was the only partner, besides Strategia, who had exclusivity as a part of their alliance agreement. Furthermore, your comment about the additional staff is truly ridiculous. First of all CSGI didn't have a CFO or a in-house attorney. (which most companies have), Those positions were added today along with someone to replace Jeff Richards for Domestic Sales, since Mr. Richards is now going to be in charge of International Sales. (gee, I wonder why, You don't think there might be some news coming regarding International contracts do you? <ggg>) Oh well, I guess we just have to wait and see. Also, my comments regarding "adding staff" have nothing to do with adding managerial staff, they had to do with adding "bodies" to do conversions. Wow, even with these new appointments CSGI has a total, of what?, 33 people now... Yeah, there goes the overhead <g> GIVE ME A Friggin' BREAK! Why don't you compare that to companies who have to hire hundreds of people just to convert code. I'll give you a little hint, I don't think CSGI is going to hire hundreds and hundreds of V.P.'s <gg> Your posts still contain so much B.S., that they are easily dismissed by anyone who knows anything at all about this company. Keep Trying. (at least this time you didn't have that much blatant falsehoods in your post, but lots of misinformation still.) I know you'll try to do better next time. Have a wonderful day. Your buddy. Tech. Btw - ALL of my "claims" about them needing a small number of employees is completely, absolutely, positively, 100% Correct