To: Marcel who wrote (1213 ) 2/19/1998 7:53:00 PM From: Maverick Respond to of 1629
Study ranks ISPs' performance Jeff Pelline CNET NEWS.COM IBM, recently criticized by some customers for its plans to put an hourly cap on Net access, ranked first in a study of reliability among 90 Internet service providers, while giant America Online fell slightly below average. The study released today by Boardwatch Magazine is the latest attempt to rank the performance of ISPs, which increasingly are becoming another monthly expense for consumers, similar to long distance telephone service. But as is the case with long distance phone providers, choosing an ISP--and measuring its reliability, for that matter--is no easy task. In this case, Boardwatch set out to calculate call completion rates and busy signals for 90 Internet service providers. Between January 1 and February 1, more than 145,000 calls were made to 450 points of presence during the peak 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. period. "Customer dissatisfaction with Internet service providers is growing and is beginning to dramatically increase churn rates as dial-up customers look for alternatives," Jack Rickard, editor of Boardwatch, said in a statement. "Virtually all of it centers around one topic--busy signals. We wanted to see if it was really a problem. It is." The top ten ranked ISPs, in order, were as follows: IBM Connect, TEK Interactive Group, MCI, Micronet, MindSpring, GroundZer0, Fnet Corporation, TDSNET, Log On America, and WebUSA. Among those ranked in the top ten by Boardwatch, IBM recently put a 100 hour-per-month cap on access for subscribers who pay $19.95 per month for its service; beyond that, they pay extra. Similar to other ISPs, IBM cited pressure on profits as more users stay logged on for longer periods. But many users complained and threatened to switch ISPs.