Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1478257)	8/16/2024 10:39:46 AM
From: Bill	2 Recommendations Recommended By Bonefish longz Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573950

the point is that the facts of the case are not in dispute. Brilliant observation. Appeals courts don't evaluate facts. They evaluate law and procedure. Trump's appeal will focus on whether the statute charged was applicable to the facts and circumstances, and whether the judge committed reversable error in both jury instructions and allowing prejudicial testimony. The NY Court of Appeals reversed the Harvey Weinstein conviction in April because of prejudicial testimony. That court will get this appeal if the first appeals court denies his appeal this fall. Again, Merchan and the dems don't really care about the appeal. Their goal was accomplished by labelling Trump a convicted felon before his election bid. That's why it's a sham.