To: BamaReb who wrote (7473 ) 2/19/1998 10:02:00 PM From: Laserbones Respond to of 11888
As it was pointed out by JT, this news release concerned what appears to be well log data. I'm not sure it is Soviet, since the Kasak gov itself also directed wells to be drilled at Chikuduk. This information is not part of the ongoing seismic program, but much older data from an actual well site. Qdog should be able to give us a clearer understanding of the numbers, but let me try my 2 cents worth: 3000 meters is getting toward 2 miles down. Certainly not the deepest well, but it's not right at the surface either. Call it a nothing out of the ordinary depth. The pay zone @ 140 feet may or may not mean that oil\hydrocarbons in commercial quantity are here. The average porosity is okay. The water number is sort of on the high side, but there are lots of commercial wells with high water numbers. An example: Fill a large glass cylinder closed at the bottom with 1/2 water, 1/4 oil, and 1/2 sand. Shake the cylinder and allow the contents to settle. After the system has reached its lowest energy state, the following should be expected...water is at its highest concentration toward the bottom with the oil eventually coming toward the top of the column. The deeper into the contents a sample is made, the higher the water content. The shallower, the greater the oil. The pay zone would be the area in which oil is sampled at higher concentrations, or an area toward the top of the cylinder. In the real world, the cylinder would be the geological trap containing the suspected hydrocarbon producing strata. The pay zone would be an area of thickness that yields hydrocarbons. Things can get complicated since the same geological trap my actually have multiple pay zones separated by layers of low permeability. My bottom line on the news is it is interesting, but still not earth shattering information by any means. Greg