Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (300916)	9/5/2024 5:20:10 PM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Recommended By longz Maple MAGA Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 358465

Details Wharfie. Of course some children end up as orphans. Some children have mothers who got pregnant oops a daisy and adoption is needed. Some wealthy women want a baby via excellent sperm donor but no man hanging around. Some perverts want a baby to put in child abuse videos. Or just for fun in privacy. I was describing the broad best way to do eugenics = woman chooses man with great care, eliminating as many bad genes as she can. Man thinks she's a good choice after due diligence. They produce a family with the help of genetic engineering to further refine their DNA, adding in high IQ hot stuff genes and deleting bad genes like cystic fibrosis, stomach cancer, haemachromatosis, and hordes of others. That doesn't exclude other children. I would exclude perverts. Mqurice