Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fiscally Conservative who wrote (1483582)	9/6/2024 9:44:26 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573927

Mexico needs to be part of the solution. A huge wall isn't practical because of the cost involved. So - if they refuse to be part of the solution then we need to inform them that we will take the top 20% of their country and Baja. At that point a wall would be far more feasible Then we need to treat the cartels the same way we would if a hostile nation were trying to invade the US. We also have to lower the appetite for drugs that our citizens have. None of this is the preferred solution but maybe the threat would be enough to prompt Mexico to be part of the solution. That still leaves us with the cartels to deal with. If their countries refuse to eliminate them then we'll have to use our military. We have enough industry to raise the standard of living for the entire hemisphere but we can't do that without some help.