Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Saliva Diagnostics (SALV) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Green who wrote (2135)	2/20/1998 1:44:00 AM
From: brad greene	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3369

Go get them Gary....... Base your lawsuit on a post about possible comments by perhaps the CEO of SALV...that you read on this thread. Does SALV have E&O insurance? If not, forget it. If there is any money in a suit....let me know, I'm there. If not.... relax and load up on those warrants......I think Merck only wants the warrants. bg

To: Gary Green who wrote (2135)	2/20/1998 1:49:00 AM
From: rustyjack	Respond to of 3369

Legal Action....again??? I suggest if you cannot handle losing money on a speculative investment (both TIRE and SALV were very speculative) then you should stick with the big well-established companies. We all got into these stocks with visions of huge gains quickly. I was also in TIRE and lost money. I will probably lose money in SALV, but I realized when I bought, it was a high risk investment and can accept that you win sometimes, but probably more often lose. I hardly think legal action would accomplish ANYTHING except to destroy the company. It certainly will not re-coup our loses. The last thing we need is for you to start a lawsuit as you did with TIRE. It accomplished NOTHING there either. Let it go, Gary.

To: Gary Green who wrote (2135)	2/20/1998 11:29:00 AM
From: rl	Respond to of 3369

Are you questioning the word of the current SALV CEO? I guess it's OK to say you "fired" someone who you work FOR, after announcing that the supposed firee "resigned." If you look back on the releases and filings of SALV just prior to the firning/resignation of the prior CEO you will see that the BOD of SALV was composed of three Europeans and i American. Guess who got fired/resigned? Has Lealos ever responded to the accusations of fraud or the firing/resignation issue? I think not, other than via a lawsuit that is still out there. Look at the management of SALV in late "96. It lists Lealos, McLachlan, David Barnes, and Duke Van kalken in Singapore. Guess who's still there, while the two that are gone are being characterized as thiefs. When the BOD of a Delaware corporation fires an officer, they can then appoint whoever they want as replacement without consulting the shareholders. If you have a BOD of 3 Europeans and 1 American, even though he was the founder of the Company, and he is "fired", who do you think will takeover? Who will then be demonized? All mistakes can easily be blamed on someone who is in no position to defend himself. But,in the case of SALV, 14 months have elapsed since the firing/resignation. How long can McLachlan use this excuse for the lack of performance of the stock and sales of the product that he has praised so highly and spoke of success so often in his press releases. Do you think McLachlan felt he owed the shareholders any announcement after he "fired" the former CEO? Obviously not. Do you think if the fraud etc. were present, he would have not said a thing in the filings or otherwise if it were true? What a perfect way toscapegoat. I'm just amazed he hasn't trundled out this one before. Why then would he keep the Singapore man working until a month ago if he was stealing? I wonder why manufacturing is being sent to England? Getting back closer to home? The ex-BOD member, Barnes, is still listed as management and heads the London office. Why?