To: Spekulatius who wrote (76294 ) 10/6/2024 7:57:11 AM From: Harshu Vyas Respond to of 78748 I should clarify what I'm looking for. I'm looking for my take on young Buffett stocks - companies with lots of cash, no solvency concerns and still slightly profitable that benefit from a turnaround in the industry. So, in effect, cyclicals and other sectors that seem to be beaten down. Of course, you do get a lot of trash in the screen you have to filter through, but that's the fun! You're right in that if I get rid of the P/S I get "better" companies. But the market knows about "better" companies and it seems "better" companies are already fairly/overvalued. I think it was Jim Chanos that said that "in a bear market, the reality gets a discount and in a bull market, the future gets a premium" (or something to that effect). It's stuck with me. Take the worst (imo) of the "better" companies - COST, WMT now trade at 50x earnings, 50x forward earnings - it's insane. But also realise that I play with loads of screens and adjust them - sometimes I'll take out the ROE and EBITDA and swap it out with GM to try to find something loss-making. Sometimes I'll use technical indicators. Sometimes I'll look for the better company using ROE and debt/equity but I'll never really bite. This was in no ways a "perfect" screen. Just one where I found myself writing down a lot of potential companies to buy. In fact, in the UK, there are many companies I can/would buy in a heartbeat but don't have the size for. In the US, I find myself passing on a lot more companies because of the horrendous balance sheets that have become so normalised. In the UK, I have to pass because I have to estimate which company will outperform and somehow find a catalyst (if there is one) - and that requires more work than just seeing something undervalued and jumping at it. Not a bad problem to have. Thank you for pointing that out. I should have been more clear.