Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1492523)	10/10/2024 5:38:42 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570939

No, but I'm honest. Many people from that era agree that using LSD, at least once or twice, vastly changed their outlook on what were their own capabilities. Most notably, The Beatles were dosed with LSD at a party by a friend who was a dentist, without their knowledge or approval. Their next records were Revolver (and Sgt. Peppers, their greatest works) and certainly many see Sgt Pepper as the greatest rock album ever made (which is my take, as well). These were undoubtedly some of the early Owsley batches, known for purity and effectiveness. LSD is a bizarre drug, but it isn't to be confused with addictive substances like opiates or every day abuse like marijuana. It is powerful, but mostly harmless. Some people over-exposed themselves to it and it could become harmful in that environment. A person should not assume that some of these drugs aren't useful just because they were drugs of significant abuse 50 years ago. It is much like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin for Covid. A lot of people didn't believe in the effectiveness because they weren't rubber stamped by Pharma. Many people died as a result. Today, most of us have learned that Pharma produces some great products, but will not touch them if the patents are expired. Most of us do know what's up with that these days.