SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (306080)10/11/2024 5:33:12 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 354758
 
That article was not about climate change but about what has happened to people who have lost their natural, common-sense instinct to recognize things that are risible on their face, who have so bought into the ridiculous that their judgment is topsy turvy, lost the ability to differentiate satire because obvious nonsense and likely reality have merged.

I guess you missed tha pointt. Or are past caring.
I understood the point of the article, but was simply pointing out in reply that the beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Or, in this case, the nonsense is.

That Dem partisans attach negativity to everything they don't like is nothing new. That, in and of itself, doesn't make those things good or evil based on party preference. And news flash, but Republicans do that, as well.

The science of climate change is still working its way through the system and no amount of deeming it to be any immediate threat to the world is going to make that factual.

That Musk has proposed a viable solution to carbon emissions and Democrats are shunning it because he also understands we cannot do another four years of extreme leftism in our leadership, that prospective cure is now back-burnered.



To: Lane3 who wrote (306080)10/12/2024 10:19:43 AM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Respond to of 354758
 
For decades now, I have seen Noodles as a bellwether of sorts.



To: Lane3 who wrote (306080)10/12/2024 2:03:29 PM
From: i-node4 Recommendations

Recommended By
ig
longz
pocotrader
Thomas M.

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 354758
 
When I see the word "misinformation" my eyes glaze over.

There is, literally, nothing that can be done about it. And I'm not sure we'd want to.

We have so called "peer review", for example, and in the scientific literature it is a total joke. In politics, it is even worse: Because the news media is protected, anything goes (unless you're Fox News, of course). But you can lie about Donald Trump all you want. In one case CNN claimed to have "22 off the record sources" reporting some bit of "truth" from the Mueller investigation which somehow (hehe) turned out to be wrong.

51 "former intelligence agents" were critical in corrupting the 2020 election (we're apt to see something along those lines shortly) outcome, total misinformation (lies), yet Democrats everywhere and some Republicans (the targets) bought it. It chocked full of obvious lies, but that didn't matter.

So when you talk about "doing something" about misinformation, the unanswerable question is "Who knows what the truth is?" You? Me? Bentway? CJ?

It is a topic without a logical end point. And information is in all most all cases, time-sensitive.

Talk of anyone doing anything about lies is a total joke.