Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Point and Figure Charting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (926)	2/20/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: Ms. X	Respond to of 34814

Ben, Bobster, All... Just was in Dorsey's site... He has additional box sizes now. He is out of town so I can't ask him about this but check it out. I found it on Intel's char (I'm sure it is on others) but you have a choice of box sizes. Thought I would pass it on, Jan

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (926)	2/20/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: bobster	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34814

Wow, thanks big, but could you talk a little slower. Waveforms on oscilloscopes. Whew. I had to read it a bunch of times. Just to make sure I understand, you concur that using a 3 box reversal is the way to go? And as far as 2% vs. a fixed box size, you vote for 2%. It seems like 2% is more logical to me also. But did I understand you correctly, that it doesn't make much difference in the chart pattern? You also seemed to imply that traditional charts are needed for support and resistance lines. Why? Traditional...I assume that is a fixed box size chart. Am I right? Thanks again, bobster