Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KM who wrote (48347)	2/20/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: Brendan2012	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

So, can you explain why you think there's merit here? You do realize the burden of proof is on you, don't you? Brendan

To: KM who wrote (48347)	2/20/1998 1:59:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

I posted that at first I was skeptical of the Iomega lawsuits (as with nearly any investor lawsuit). And I admit my 2 semesters of Business Law don't exactly qualify me to pontificate on the matter, but with all of the sharks now circling the boat, there has got to be something to these claims. I figure that Iomega will settle out of court and take a charge to a Q's earnings.