Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cruncher who wrote (48370)	2/20/1998 3:15:00 PM
From: Spank	Respond to of 58324

cruncher, yeah, KE's sale wasn't that much. I think it's ludicrous that people lend credence to the notion that he knew the stock was going to take a dive. I guess he's happy with the 50% drop in the remaining 86% of his shares since he was able to get off the sinking ship. Maybe that's what we're supposed to believe. I wish the lawsuit players would stop yelling "victim" and get on with it. Yeesh. makes me sick... more revolting than the loss we took that got us here. -Spank

To: cruncher who wrote (48370)	2/20/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: Gary Wisdom	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Cruncher, those numbers from Tyler are bullshit. He sold a lot more than 14% of his shares. Tyler's including newly issued options in that figure. Whichever spin you want to put on it, he sold at the high. Not particularly good for his legal defense.