SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (60069)11/1/2024 12:16:20 PM
From: Doug M.Respond to of 72145
 
<<While it is possible that the actual product - Falcon Shores GPU - will be a competent
product, gaining ground even with a good product will be challenging.>>

Intel doesn't intend to compete against NVIDIA, Amazon, Google, etc.
in training - but AMD does. Intel wants to be a foundry for them later this
decade. And as Craig Barrett said recently (a former Intel CEO - I posted his
article the other day) if Intel provides leading process technology, the business
will come. And that's exactly what Intel intends to do with High NA EUV at 14A.

Here are Intel's GPU plans:

<<The Next Phase of Transformation Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger [ last month said] the
company is refocusing its product strategy around a “strong x86 franchise as we
drive our AI strategy while streamlining our product portfolio in service to Intel
customers and partners.”

Gelsinger has also communicated that Intel will play in the AI inferencing market with
Gaudi and other AI chips. He acknowledged Intel was behind Nvidia, AMD, and Google’s
GPU in the AI training market.

“As I view it… in the four-horse race on this side of the page, Nvidia, (AWS’s) Trainium
and Inferentia, Google Cloud’s TPU, and AMD, and Intel’s number four… that’s hard,”
Gelsinger said.>>

Stayin' Alive: Intel's Falcon Shores GPU Will Survive Restructuring

And this should give paus if anyone thinks that AMD will grow training GPU's in
perpetuity - I saw one of those posts earlier today. Yes, this is long-term but
so are Intel's foundry plans:

<<Thirdly, comments from Broadcom CEO Hock Tan on Thursday after
earnings point to a major threat to Nvidia demand from those same
megacap tech companies:

There's one market for enterprises of the world, and none of these
enterprises are incapable nor have the financial resources or interest
to create the silicon, the custom silicon, nor the large language models
and the software going maybe, to be able to run those AI workloads
on custom silicon. It's too much and there's no return for them to do it
because it's just too expensive to do it. But there are those few cloud guys,
hyperscalers with the scale of the platform and the financial wherewithal for
them to make it totally rational, economically rational, to create their own
custom accelerators because right now, I'm not trying to overemphasize it,
it's all about compute engines. It's all about especially training those large
language models and enabling it on your platform.
It's all about constraint,
to a large part, about GPUs. Seriously, it came to a point where GPUs are
more important than engineers, these hyperscalers in terms of how they
think. Those GPUs are much more -- or XPUs are much more important.
And if that's the case, what better thing to do than bringing the control,
control your their own destiny by creating your own custom silicon
accelerators. And that's what I'm seeing all of them do. It's just doing
it at different rates and they're starting at different times.But they all
have started.">>

Did a flawed Goldman Sachs report roil the market on Friday? | Forexlive