Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Millennium who wrote (7491)	2/20/1998 6:19:00 PM
From: hoosier bob	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11888

I think we just heard that the data doesn't mean much. What do you think qdog? hoosier bob

To: Millennium who wrote (7491)	2/21/1998 10:18:00 AM
From: OILRX	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11888

Been sittin on the sidelines till now. Got in early at $0.406 in 12/96. I ain't goin anywhere. Thanks to Lorrie Olivier for communicating these data. Regarding RESTECH, our large, international 'seven-sister' oil company uses them frequently for petrophysical analysis around the world, although we have 10 log analysts on staff (use RESTECH as independent QC). The discussion is pretty much right on, especially when talking about the quality of Russian E-logs (notoriously poor). Yep, mud filtrate sitting in the formation for a while before logging (especially in 15-30% porosity rocks, permeabilities of what.....50-500 md?) will do wonders for Sw (water saturation). Also, the type of rock holding the water and oil is important in log analysis: the presence of chlorite or other clays having microporosity (and non-producible, bound water) will overstate the amount of water. I'm buying more.