Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Exall Resources/Glimmer Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Winzer who wrote (505)	2/20/1998 8:38:00 PM
From: Brader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1319

My father happened to talk to Mr. McCoskey a few months ago by phone. When asked about the situation with Glimmer possibly getting control of the mine, he intimated that he thought Exall was doing a good job operating the project and that they might not rush in and change things. He also said that they were chasing the vein all over the place. Winzer, is this possible that they could continue operating the project as is, and maybe Glimmer sitting back and banking revenue while paying some sort of fee to Exall? I own both Exall and Glimmer and I also want this legal situation to come to closure as soon as possible as this play is undervalued.

To: Winzer who wrote (505)	2/22/1998 7:13:00 PM
From: James N. Wilson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1319

Winzer - Although I can't find a PR about the reported 325,460 ounces (as reported in N.M.) - this would now bring the expected mine life to over 5 years and should be viewed as encouraging developments. The news about the finders fee is to be expected with most private placements. As JV partners continue to slug it out high/grade ore at Glimmer is ramped-up. Perhaps we have the makings for another Dome mine here. take care, james P.S. If you get a good rate on the tool shed let me know !! I might try the same !! ha.. ha..