Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (190645)	11/14/2024 1:02:10 PM
From: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196499

Your chart is I think the most interesting because it's not a % of the float, which has been going down (untill recently)

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (190645)	11/14/2024 1:57:06 PM
From: Peter Sherman	7 Recommendations Recommended By jazzcat2000 Jim Mullens Jon Koplik Lance Bredvold matherandlowell and 2 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196499

I believe the institutional ownership share info is skewed. For example, in my family there are about 40 individuals who all own large QCOM holdings. All 40 folks are part of our Family Office. The Family Office is managed by Fidelity Family Office Services [ FFOS ]. The family office has a corporate name but all the shares are held in hundreds of individual accounts at FIDO, with each in each person's name. So, it looks like the shares are "owned" by FIDO but I can buy or sell QCOM shares just by going into my individual personal [ 3 ] accounts at FIDO FFOS.

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (190645)	11/14/2024 3:11:45 PM
From: Greg13605	Respond to of 196499

Jim: in my post # 190633, I attached a screen shot from my phone taken on 11/ 01/24. I sometimes take them to keep track of the numbers of tutes and the percentage of ownership, but generally we are fighting for quarter of a percent moves. This jump that I just noticed today and it wasn't there earlier this week, was IMO HUGE. When I saw the change, I felt it really had to be an error, but IMO it reflects what I believe, that the daily fluctuations we endure, are merely misdirection and tools of the people behind the curtains, because during these most recent share price fluctuations that occurred after the earnings call, it appears that while others were capitulating and throwing in the towel on Q, the folks behind the curtain, were acquiring another... 79.27 MILLION SHARES, while the daily markets were indicating that the share price was floundering!!! GO FIGURE