Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN who wrote (190749)	11/19/2024 7:13:52 PM
From: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN	6 Recommendations Recommended By abd4b GR8FORM Ken Carrillo Lance Bredvold Qurious and 1 more member Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196723

I've finally found the counter claims... had to repurchase it off PACER... Minus 6 bucks for me I guess. Counter Claim 1e. e. ARM breached the NUVIA ALA by failing to fulfill its termination obligations under [REDACTED]; f. ARM breached the NUVIA TLA by failing to fulfill its termination obligations under [REDACTED]; I suspect these are timely assignment of the ALA to Qualcomm as required by the TLA/ALA or something simliar. COUNT II (Breach of [REDACTED] of the NUVIA ALA ) 278. Defendants incorporate by reference all allegations set forth in the preceding paragraphs 1-47 and 175-277 as though fully set forth herein. 279. The NUVIA ALA was a valid, binding contract. 280. ARM failed to fulfill its termination obligations to NUVIA, as set forth in of the NUVIA ALA, by continuing to use NUVIA Technology and failing to return or destroy NUVIA Confidential Information after termination. 281. As a proximate result of ARM’s breach of contract, Defendants have been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial. COUNT III (Breach of [REDACTED] of the NUVIA TLA) 282. Defendants incorporate by reference all allegations set forth in the preceding paragraphs 1-47 and 175-281 as though fully set forth herein. 283. The NUVIA TLA was a valid, binding contract. 284. ARM failed to fulfill its termination obligations to NUVIA, as set forth in of the NUVIA TLA, by continuing to use NUVIA Technology and failing to return or destroy NUVIA Confidential Information after termination. 285. As a proximate result of ARM’s breach of contract, Defendants have been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial. The counts 2 and 3 surround the use of the CMN mesh and NC-Booker which Nuvia asked ARM to develop, and ARM was supposed to discontinue use after terminating the ALA/TLA but shipped it in Neoverse. It's possible that during the in-person meeting they came to some sort of agreement surrounding the license use of that or something?