To: jeffbas who wrote (144 ) 2/21/1998 3:19:00 PM From: Duane L. Olson Respond to of 955
Report: In the May 97 10Q Filing with the SEC, sharp sales growth is reported by DPMI. This should be treated as: 1. Part of the previous 7 quarters of no sales growth. b. A fraud on the part of DPMI QUOTE: DUPONT PHOTOMASKS INC Filed on May 5 1997 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company and the related notes thereto. Prior to the Company's initial public offering (the IPO) on June 13, 1996, it was a wholly-owned subsidiary of E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont). The Company's historical results prior to the IPO are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved if the Company had been independent and may not be an accurate indication of future results. The pro forma income statement estimates the effects of certain events associated with the IPO as if such events had taken place on July 1, 1995. The pro forma income statement does not purport to represent what the results of operations of the Company would actually have been had certain events in fact occurred on July 1, 1995 or to project the results of operations of the Company for any future period. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SALES Sales are comprised primarily of photomask sales to semiconductor manufacturers. Sales increased 12.3% from $55.9 million in the quarter ended March 31, 1996 to $62.8 million in the quarter ended March 31, 1997. Sales in North America, Europe and Asia increased from $31.7 million, $14.4 million, and $9.8 million in the quarter ended March 31, 1996 to $35.9 million, $16.1 million, and $10.8 million in the quarter ended March 31, 1997. Sales increased 25.7% from $152.2 million in the nine months ended March 31, 1996 to $191.3 million in the nine months ended March 31, 1997. Sales in North America, Europe and Asia increased from $88.8 million, $37.5 million, and $25.9 million in the nine months ended March 31, 1996 to $107.0 million, $46.2 million, and $38.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 1997. A continued increase in the demand for advanced photomasks which have higher average selling prices was a primary contributor to the increase in sales during these periods. This shift in demand reflects what the Company believes to be a trend toward higher utilization of complex semiconductor devices with finer line-widths. dlo