SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IC720 who wrote (1504794)11/27/2024 8:02:54 AM
From: golfer721 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570489
 
The CDC knew full well IVM was effective against Covid. I'm sure they know this too



To: IC720 who wrote (1504794)11/27/2024 8:26:55 AM
From: sylvester802 Recommendations

Recommended By
Eric
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570489
 
BOOM: Mexico suggests it would impose its own tariffs to retaliate against any Trump tariffs


Updated 5:36 PM MST, November 26, 2024
apnews.com
MEXICO CITY (AP) — President Claudia Sheinbaum suggested Tuesday that Mexico could retaliate with tariffs of its own, after U.S. President-elect Donald Trump threatened to impose 25% import duties on Mexican goods if the country doesn’t stop the flow of drugs and migrants across the border.

Sheinbaum said she was willing to engage in talks on the issues, but said drugs were a U.S. problem.

“One tariff would be followed by another in response, and so on until we put at risk common businesses,” Sheinbaum said, referring to U.S. automakers that have plants on both sides of the border.

She said Tuesday that Mexico had done a lot to stem the flow of migrants, noting “caravans of migrants no longer reach the border.” However, Mexico’s efforts to fight drugs like the deadly synthetic opioid fentanyl — which is manufactured by Mexican cartels using chemicals imported from China — have weakened in the last year.

Sheinbaum said Mexico suffered from an influx of weapons smuggled in from the United States, and said the flow of drugs “is a problem of public health and consumption in your country’s society.”

Trump's threat to impose tariffs could raise prices for consumers

Sheinbaum also criticized U.S. spending on weapons, saying the money should instead be spent regionally to address the problem of migration. “If a percentage of what the United States spends on war were dedicated to peace and development, that would address the underlying causes of migration,” she said.

Sheinbaum’s bristly response suggests that Trump faces a much different Mexican president than he did in his first term.

Back in late 2018, former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador was a charismatic, old-school politician who developed a chummy relationship with Trump. The two were eventually able to strike a bargain in which Mexico helped keep migrants away from the border — and received other countries’ deported migrants — and Trump backed down on the threats.

But Sheinbaum, who took office Oct. 1, is a stern leftist ideologue trained in radical student protest movements, and appears less willing to pacify or mollify Trump.

“We negotiate as equals, there is no subordination here, because we are a great nation,” Sheinbaum said, while adding, “I think we are going to reach an agreement.”

But Gabriela Siller, director of economic analysis of the financial group Banco Base, fears the personality clash could escalate things into brinkmanship; Trump clearly hates to lose.

“Trump may have just tossed the threat out there, as he does,” Siller said. “But Mexico’s response, that we’re going to respond to you with tariffs, that will make Trump really impose them.”

It’s not clear how serious Trump’s threat is. The U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement forbids just imposing tariffs on other member countries. And it’s not clear whether the economy could even tolerate sudden levies on imports: Auto plants on both sides of the border rely on each other for parts and components, and some production lines could screech to a halt.

“It is unacceptable and would cause inflation and job losses in Mexico and the United States,” Sheinbaum said, while offering to talk about the issues. “If tariffs go up, who will it hurt? General Motors,” she said.

“Dialogue is the best path to achieve understanding, peace and prosperity for our two countries,” Sheinbaum said. “I hope our teams can meet soon.”

Late Monday, Trump said he would impose a 25% tax on all products entering the country from Canada and Mexico, and an additional 10% tariff on goods from China, as one of his first executive orders.

The tariffs, if implemented, could dramatically raise prices for American consumers on everything from gas to automobiles to agricultural products. The U.S. is the largest importer of goods in the world, with Mexico, China and Canada its top three suppliers, according to the most recent U.S. Census data.

Trump made the threats Monday in a pair of posts on his Truth Social site in which he railed against an influx of illegal migrants, even though apprehensions at the southern border have been hovering near four-year lows.

“On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders,” he wrote.

He said the new tariffs would remain in place “until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country!”

“Both Mexico and Canada have the absolute right and power to easily solve this long simmering problem. We hereby demand that they use this power,” he went on, “and until such time that they do, it is time for them to pay a very big price!”



To: IC720 who wrote (1504794)11/27/2024 8:32:10 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 1570489
 
BOOM: Oil executives throw cold water on Trump’s ‘Drill, Baby, Drill’ agenda
By Callie Patteson
November 26, 2024 10:46 am
washingtonexaminer.com

Swiftly increasing domestic oil and gas production may prove more difficult than anticipated for President-elect Donald Trump, as oil executives have cast doubt on his “Drill, Baby, Drill” agenda.

Throughout his campaign and transition into office, Trump has vowed to expand oil and gas drilling within the United States. It is a sharp shift away from renewable alternatives, such as solar and wind, that have been the focus of the Biden administration.

In order to put his plan in action, Trump is expected to issue a number of day one, or week one, orders to roll back climate rules and laws implemented by his predecessor, namely by undoing pollution rules for power plants, expediting liquid natural gas permit approvals, and cutting federal funding for offshore wind development.

While environmentalists and climate activists have expressed concerns over the emphasis and support on fossil fuels in Trump’s energy agenda, he may also be facing pushback from within the oil industry itself.

On Tuesday, Exxon Mobil’s Upstream Company President Liam Mallon said the global oil and gas giant is not expecting many producers to immediately fall in line with the incoming president’s goals for boosting output.

AD

“We’re not going to see anybody in ‘drill, baby, drill’ mode,” Mallon said during the Energy Intelligence Forum in London, according to Reuters.

Mallon said output growth would be limited by investors’ desire to maintain capital discipline.

“A radical change [in production] is unlikely because the vast majority, if not everybody, is focused on the economics of what they’re doing,” he said.

That’s not to say Exxon doesn’t expect to see any growth. In May, the company completed a deal to purchase Pioneer Natural Resources, a smaller rival oil and gas company that operates in the Permian Basin, for around $60 billion. At the time, Exxon said the acquisition would allow the company to more than double its production from the Permian Basin — likely beyond 2 million barrels every day.

AD

While eased permitting regulations would allow for a short-term boost in production, Mallon said, growth at that rate won’t continue over time.

“We see growth beyond the 2 million, probably for a couple of years, but not at that continuous same rate … certainly up to 2030, we see it growing,” the executive said.

The U.S. is currently the leading producer of oil worldwide, producing more than 13.4 million barrels a day. At the current rate, that is only expected to increase to around 13.6 million barrels per day by the end of next year, according to the Energy Information Administration.

With the cost of international and U.S. crude benchmarks staying in the high $60s and low $70s range, a dramatic increase in production could depress prices even further, sending averages to below $60. While this would lower prices for consumers, it would lower profits for producers. As a result, some experts have suggested more supply in the market would lead companies or producing blocs such as OPEC+ to cut production once again.

“If the Trump administration opens up federal leases for oil and gas, Federal lands would get 25% per barrel of revenues. You will have a lot of trouble finding an oil company that can make money at $52.50 per barrel with what they have left from a $70 barrel,” Smead Capital CEO Cold Smead told CNBC earlier this month. “The only thing that will cause drill baby drill to happen is higher oil prices based on these margins.”

With 55 days remaining until Trump takes office again, the president-elect’s transition team has already begun drafting his day one energy agenda. He is expected to keep his campaign promises regarding support for the oil and gas industry.



To: IC720 who wrote (1504794)11/27/2024 8:35:58 AM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570489
 
Every time I see posts with [X] I know NOT to read those MAGA shithole LIES... so thanks...