SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donald Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 11:49:17 AM
From: FJB3 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
GROUND ZERO™
Thehammer

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74332
 
That faggot called her a "seasoned prosecutor". If there was a record of her prosecuting one serious case successfully, we would have heard about it a million times by now.



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 11:49:50 AM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™

  Respond to of 74332
 
Risking Nuclear War


Escalating brinkmanship might be justified if victory were in sight or if any of this contributed to American security. But none of these things are true...



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:15:19 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
GROUND ZERO™

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74332
 
The Top States Where Americans Are Looking to Buy Homes Heading Into 2025




To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:22:12 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™
Thehammer

  Respond to of 74332
 
Trump Transition Team Is Rightly Wary Of Sleazy General Services Administration
‘Stealing records and sharing the victim’s private information isn’t any way to build up trust,’ said Sen. Chuck Grassley.

...
Trump’s reluctance to work with the federal government’s procurement and real estate leviathan is understandable. The GSA and the FBI have a history of duplicitous conduct related to the 45th — and soon-to-be-47th — president.

Enemy of the Deep State

In their 2020 report, Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., exposed how the GSA “secretly handed over the first Trump team’s privileged and confidential information to the FBI” (Federal Bureau of Investigation), even as the FBI played political games with the infamous and unfounded counterintelligence probe into Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. Grassley at the time served as chairman of the Senate’s Finance Committee. Johnson led the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

The report, titled “ Don’t Brief the Trump Team: How the GSA and the FBI Secretly Shared Trump Transition Team Records,” details how the FBI and then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office trampled all over the transition team’s private property rights.

“Even after the Trump transition team learned about the FBI’s secret preservation request, the GSA nevertheless refused to immediately provide the Trump transition team copies of its own records,” a joint press release from the senators stated at the time. “Instead, after denying the Trump transition team its basic legal rights to control its own information, including the opportunity to protect privileged or confidential information, the GSA turned over records for current and former administration officials to the Special Counsel without requiring any legal process, such as a subpoena or warrant.”

Sound familiar? These are the kind of political games the deep state has been playing for years to thwart a duly elected president who has campaigned on “draining the swamp.”

The 25-page report, among other charges, asserts that “the GSA intentionally withheld notification from Trump for America of its decision to preserve transition records in violation of the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding.”

As the report’s executive summary notes, “The United States is renowned for its peaceful transitions of power.” In furtherance of that cause, successful “presidential candidates have received government assistance in forming and administering their transition teams.” But it’s clear that the deep state players from the beginning saw the incoming president as a threat, as an enemy of the state.

‘Disparate Treatment’


Denise Turner Roth, an Obama appointee, served as GSA administrator at the time of Trump’s transition into the White House in late 2016. Roth and her successors were very accommodating to the FBI. On Feb. 15, 2017, after Trump’s national security advisor, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, resigned his post amid phony Russian collusion allegations, “GSA officials proactively contacted the FBI (through the GSA’s Office of the Inspector General) to ask if they should preserve the Trump transition team records,” the report states. Yes, please, the FBI quickly responded. In violation of the memorandum, GSA decided to preserve all transition records despite the absence of a subpoena.

By August, the special counsel had obtained all of the transition team records for 13 Trump for America officials, including then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo, then-national security advisor to the vice president Keith Kellogg, and Jared Kushner.

On Dec. 19, 2017, the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee received a letter from Trump for America general counsel Kory Langhofer. In the letter, Langhofer stated that “the GSA provided Trump for America’s records to the special counsel without giving prior notice, obtaining its consent, or providing it an opportunity to review the records for privilege or relevance.” The committee reviewed and confirmed the information.

Tellingly, as the report’s footnotes detail:

Over the course of this investigation, the GSA produced thousands of lightly redacted pages that were responsive to requests made by both Committees. In contrast, the FBI produced heavily redacted documents, including some of the same documents that the GSA produced with no or minimal redactions. For this reason, the Committees had little insight into the internal communications at the FBI about this matter, especially as compared to GSA.

The report describes the government’s double-dealing as “yet another example of the disparate treatment the Trump campaign and administration received from the federal bureaucracy.”

“For example, the U.S. Department of Justice Inspector General’s report about the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign described the FBI’s use of a transition team briefings as an opportunity to investigate the campaign itself,” the report states. “Similarly, rather than provide the Trump campaign a defensive briefing about its counterintelligence concerns, as the FBI did for the [Hillary] Clinton campaign, the FBI quickly dismissed and never reconsidered that possibility.”

“Instead the FBI opened a full counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign and deployed, among other investigative techniques, confidential human sources, and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants targeting Trump campaign officials.”

The rest is infamous history in one of the darkest chapters of government abuse in U.S. history.

‘No Surprise’

GSA’s creepy conduct led to the Presidential Transition Enhancement Act, a bill introduced by Sen. Johnson that requires advance notice if either party intends to deviate from the memorandum of understanding. Trump signed the bill into law in March 2020.

None of that important background and context is included in the Politico piece and other corporate media accounts. Instead, the news outlets rely on unidentified Biden White House officials and Obama Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to warn about what they deem the dangers of the Trump transition team not playing ball with government agencies that employed all manner of unethical and illegal tactics to undermine the first Trump administration.

“Stealing records and sharing the victim’s private information isn’t any way to build up trust — especially when that victim happens to be the president-elect,” Sen. Grassley said in a statement to The Federalist. “It’s no surprise the Trump transition team is skipping out on GSA.”



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:24:35 PM
From: FJB3 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
GROUND ZERO™
Thehammer

  Respond to of 74332
 
5 Ways California’s Month-Long Vote Counting Process Invites Fraud

As of today, there are three House races left to be called, two in California and one in Iowa. In both California races, Republicans were ahead on Election Day and the days immediately after. They’ve since seen their leads evaporate as ballots continue to be counted and “cured” long after the polls closed, but the seemingly never-ending election is thanks to the state’s near month-long questionable voting process that leaves plenty of room for fraud.

Incumbent Republican Rep. John Duarte was up by approximately 3,000 votes on Election Day. Duarte has since seen his lead crumble as “more ballots were counted in Merced County” and Stanislaus County, leading to Democrat Adam Gray leading by 182 votes as of Tuesday night, according to KCRA.

Incumbent Republican Rep. Michelle Steele also now trails her Democrat opponent Derek Tran after a host of ballots were counted well after Election Day. On Nov. 6, Steele was leading Tran by more than 11,000 votes. But by Nov. 16, Steele was trailing Tran by 36 votes. That number has since grown.

Convenient? You bet.

But don’t expect the mainstream media to question the process. USA Today rushed to claim that there’s no evidence of fraud, reassuring readers that California’s extended ballot-counting process is perfectly kosher.

“There is no evidence California’s vote count is fraudulent,” USA Today’s “fact check” claims. “Experts say the state’s election laws result in any mail-in ballots, which take much longer to count.”

But California’s month-long election process is a fraudster’s dream.

The first problem is that the state prohibits localities from requiring voter identification for voters who show up to the polls in person on Election Day. When Huntington Beach residents voted to require voter ID, the state sued. Without voter ID, anyone can claim to be a voter and vote in that person’s name.

Another issue is that the state also automatically mails out ballots to every active voter — whether they request one or not. Voters have a full seven days after Election Day to send the ballots back.

But yet another issue with these ballots is that they can be postmarked by Election Day, or, per state law, if the mail-in ballot envelope is missing a postmark or there is “no date stamp for receipt from a bona fide private mail delivery service,” the ballot will still be treated as valid so long as the voter dated the envelope “or the envelope otherwise indicates that the ballot was executed on or before Election Day” and conforms to other election code requirements.

Translation: A voter can lie about when they mailed their ballot back and there’s a good chance it will still count. That’s a glaring loophole begging to be exploited.

The fourth issue is the signature matching game. California election officials do not require exact matches between the signatures on the ballot and voter records. In fact, election officials should presume the signatures are from the same voter, with excuses for any discrepancies including “trembling or shaking” hand, a voter’s “signature style” having changed over time, or a voter writing “in haste.”

But what happens when there is a serious non-match or a signature is missing altogether?

Don’t worry, voters can just “cure” their ballots — which brings us to the fifth (and perhaps most glaring) issue. In other words, voters get weeks after Election Day to “cure” any issues with their ballot that would otherwise disqualify the ballot.

Voters whose ballots are flagged by election officials as having an issue are alerted either via mail, phone, or email and given the chance to fix the issues on their ballots. Voters have until December 1 to do so. Ballots that aren’t “cured” are then rejected.

And as The San Francisco Chronicle reported, the ballot curing period has been extended this election cycle “thanks to a law passed in September” that extended the deadline to certify the election results — but only for “this fall’s election.”

“The law … is aimed at allowing a longer period of time for volunteers to reach voters who need to verify their signatures or otherwise cure their ballots,” The San Francisco Chronicle reports.

In other words, Democrat-led California, perhaps anticipating tight races, decided to preemptively change the law temporarily so that parties could get ballots “cured” and up their vote count.

In fact, Nancy Pelosi’s daughter Christine has been actively getting voters to cure their ballots, going so far as to “stake out” a voter in Modesto whose ballot needed curing, according to the San Francisco Chronicle report.

And while California will try to claim the process takes longer because it’s a larger state with millions of voters — states like Florida managed to count their votes and deliver the results on Election Day. So what’s the deal with California’s process that has conveniently flipped two key House seats in Democrats favor weeks after the election?

Brianna Lyman is an elections correspondent at The Federalist. Brianna graduated from Fordham University with a degree in International Political Economy. Her work has been featured on Newsmax, Fox News, Fox Business and RealClearPolitics. Follow Brianna on X: @briannalyman2




To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:29:45 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™

  Respond to of 74332
 
FOIA Finds Chicago Uses FEMA Funding for Democrat Donor Business to Feed Illegals



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:32:17 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74332
 
Outgoing Biden Regime Is Urging Ukraine to Quickly Lower the Age of Conscription From 25 to 18 To Keep Fighting Russia



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:34:34 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™
Thehammer

  Respond to of 74332
 



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:41:18 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™
Thehammer

  Respond to of 74332
 



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:42:10 PM
From: FJB4 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
GROUND ZERO™
relewis
Thehammer

  Respond to of 74332
 



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:47:13 PM
From: FJB3 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
GROUND ZERO™
Thehammer

  Respond to of 74332
 



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:49:37 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™

  Respond to of 74332
 



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:53:32 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™
manning18

  Respond to of 74332
 



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 12:53:58 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™

  Respond to of 74332
 



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 1:05:49 PM
From: FJB4 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
GROUND ZERO™
manning18
Thehammer

  Respond to of 74332
 



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 7:31:52 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™

  Respond to of 74332
 
FINAL STRAW: Trump Vows Sanctions Over ICC’s Anti-Semitic Actions; reports



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 7:32:11 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™

  Respond to of 74332
 
Rumble Files Lawsuit Against California — Says State’s ‘War Against Political Speech is Censorship, Plain and Simple’



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 7:33:22 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™

  Respond to of 74332
 
Yes, Yes We ARE Thankful for the Incredible Levels of COPE Over Trump's LANDSLIDE of a Win on the Left



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (59731)11/28/2024 7:33:39 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™
Thehammer

  Respond to of 74332
 
Well, Well, Well, How the Turntables Have ...: Elon Musk Promises that DOGE Will Audit the IRS