Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (312773)	12/6/2024 6:18:23 PM
From: Mannie	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 364840

Hard to present evidence if the trials are never allowed to begin. Hoping Smith releases what he has. Also, I would love to see Biden release an unreacted Muller report before he hits the exit.

To: i-node who wrote (312773)	12/6/2024 6:54:41 PM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Recommended By Maple MAGA Thomas M. Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 364840

Democrats perfectly designed this entire plan to keep Trump off the campaign trial during the 18 months before the election. For the most part, they did that -- but they didn't anticipate his ability to work hard and late to get around scheduling limitations. More importantly, they failed to understand that such criminal attacks on him made any reasonable person see what they were doing and be even more in favour of him. Similarly, Elon and many saw them shoot Trump in the ear and realized what was afoot and swung bigly in favour of him. None of the so-called felonies were anything at all. Not even faintly unethical. It's strange watching Democrats assign criminality to Trump as they lack any thinking. Another example, they think of Trump as being like Epstein. Trump says everyone is wonderful and great if they are going along with him and offering support in some way. When Epstein went bad Trump ditched him from his club house and list of favoured people. Sure Epstein was there and they both liked gorgeous hot young women. That doesn't mean Trump was doing like Epstein. And I'll defend Epstein too in that I disfavour young prostitutes cashing in, then cashing in again. One showed she had a fake legal ID proving she wasn't old enough to join in. Virginia Giuffre for example, grinning away with sucker Prince Andrew, not under duress. Which is not to say there wasn't criminal coercion in some cases. Where's the client list? Looks more like criminal conspiracy by Big Brother, Israel, Client List, than crimes by Epstein. And how did JFK come to be assassinated? And RFK? Open up all those files too. If there weren't so many dishonest, lying, criminal women trying to cash in, cover up, self-justify etc, then actual women victims of hideous male scum would be believed every time. Over the decades, my view of women as really good, sugar and spice and all things nice has had to adapt to the horrible facts of far too many of them. I even wonder if they are worse than men. Lacking the violent ability to do real damage in a short time but more malevolently self-centred. Women need resources provided by men, so they use any and all mechanisms to get while the getting is good, monkey branching as needed to increase their prospects. It sure is a mess out there in the human jungle. Dog eat dog. Human eat cat. Human eat dog. Human eat human. About half of people favour slavery - but they don't call it that. They call it free stuff from government largess. Mqurice