Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (312811)	12/7/2024 11:36:43 PM
From: Maurice Winn	3 Recommendations Recommended By longz Maple MAGA pheilman_ Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 362592

They were not all found to lack evidence. No standing was a big issue. Anyway, the obligation is on the election management to prove it's reliable, not for candidates to prove it isn't. Especially when they aren't allowed to monitor the computers during voting, check their software and connections and activity during voting, monitor all voting process closely. It's strange that you can't understand that. I guess you don't understand statistics and probability, or criminals. The court cases were laughable and the process a joke. Mqurice

To: koan who wrote (312811)	12/8/2024 12:52:20 AM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 362592

One of the problems with the absurd use of "fraud" as the claim, is that fraud can seldom be proved. It is just really hard to do, since the people committing fraud aren't stupid. They cover their trails, present plausible arguments, and Dems are sending experts to carry out the theft. The greatest problem is the inability to tie votes back to voter. The ballot, which is the proof, simply cannot be tied to person whose vote it was. You can't point to ballot and say, "That was Koan's", no matter how big a fraudster Koan might be. Even when it is possible to make such connections, the process relies on such flimsy evidence as signature matches and handwriting analysis. Unless you get a confession, it is a tough battle to find people guilty of voter fraud. Occasionally, surveillance footage has helped, but it is rare. The bottom line is that if we wanted to secure elections in a legitimate way, there does need to be a way to match ballots to the individuals who voted them. And the Left would have a cow if we did that. So, voter fraud & cheating is now an entrenched feature as far as Dems are concerned. You guys love it for some reason.