SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (48352)2/21/1998 12:49:00 PM
From: StockMan  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary,
Re -- Kurlak is also a nightmare for long term Intel investors - as a certain amount of his negative spin will inevitably linger to depress share prices for a long time to come.

This is precisely why Kurlack is "dangerous". Affecting impressions and sentiment, for the short term and often erroneously, can have a long lasting effect, especially if done repeatedly.

Stockman



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (48352)2/21/1998 1:43:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary - Kurlak has been making calls on Intel - Sells and Buys - for about 6 or 7 years in which I have paid attention.

I'd say more than 50% were bad calls.

If you look at Intel's stock, it has gyrated wildly about a line going up and to the right. In other words, the long term trend has been up - increasing share value resulting from increasing performance of Intel's financial results.

Your comment about Kurlak being a detriment to long term Intel investors is inappropriate. Kurlak has no long term affect. He may affect short term fluctuations in Intel's pricing - as will chaos in S.E. Asia, threats of technical breakthroughs at AMD, famine in Nigeria, etc.

Ultimately, Intel the corporation affects Intel's long term stock.

Kurlak is merely a leach, feeding off people's narrow minded, short sighted greed, sucking money from Merrill Lynch's clients transaction fees as they follow his buy or sell advice.

Leaches come and leaches go.

Eventually, Kurlak will be gone and forgotten - a dead leach in a pile of rotten insects and bugs.

Intel looks like it will continue to power forward for quite a long while.

Paul



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (48352)2/21/1998 2:49:00 PM
From: Luis  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary if you were influenced in your decision to make your moves in INTC based on Kurlak opinion or stay forever in INTC shares which way would you make more money /? SO I DONT PAY ATTENTION TO THIS GUY .KURLAK NEXT MOVE BUY INTC, KURLAK'S NEXT, NEXT, NEXT MOVE SELL INTC. RESULT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR MERRYL LYNCH IN TRANSACTION FEES FROM THE POOR SOULS THAT FOLLOWED HIM. Cordially, LUIS



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (48352)2/22/1998 3:18:00 AM
From: Khris Vogel  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary, rather than a nightmare, I look at Kurlak as useful.

Intel is one of the must-have's for any portfolio. It has extremely solid fundamentals, and its future looks to be much brighter than its current status (hard as that seems to be).

So, you have Kurlak regularly trying to kneecap Intel. If you see Intel as being a core holding, use Kurlak's pronouncements as an opportunity to buy at good prices, as it's sure to go up again shortly after the market realizes they've been had yet again.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (48352)2/23/1998 8:00:00 PM
From: Harry Landsiedel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary Cluny. RE: "Kurlak is also a nightmare for long term Intel investors - as a certain amount of his negative spin will inevitably linger to depress share prices for a long time to come."

I find it personally comforting that Intel has a lower PE than all the overvalued momentum stocks. Since I plan to hold it forever, I like knowing it's undervalued.

Remember, long term the market is a weighing machine. Intel's valuation will catch up to its underlying franchise value. If you are a long term investor, you will reap the rewards. If you're short term oriented, you could lose out.

HL