SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (313028)12/9/2024 7:08:34 PM
From: Wharf Rat1 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 354338
 
"The 10,000 year interglacial is now on borrowed time. "

Human emissions will delay next ice age by 50,000 years, study says
carbonbrief.org

==

"The CO2 we've produced is going to be gone in a few decades. "

100% certified bull shit.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (313028)12/9/2024 8:59:49 PM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 354338
 
Nowhere near the extent in Europe. Maybe a degree C. Even then, a couple of decades, tops. If it weren't for what happened in the Northern Hemisphere, what happened in the south was not real notable and could have been a coincidence, since those kinds of imbalances do happen. Now it might have been different if it wasn't for the Industrial Revolution, spewing out gigatons of CO2. When you look at ice core and compare with previous interglacials, it certainly seems like we hit a peak as to temperatures and were on the downhill slide, but that was 100+ppm ago. Now, again based on ice core and other data, even if all human initiated CO2 emissions were stopped immediately, we are probably looking a hundreds of thousands, if not a couple of million years before we see 280 again. So no, we don't need to keep pouring out CO2 with wild abandon.

None of this is new information. Much of it was already known way back when I got my BS in Marine Science. Like the fact of global warming.