SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (13095)12/18/2024 7:54:50 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13780
 
The world is opening the eyes.

‘The mother of all bubbles’ in the U.S. is sucking money away from the rest of the world, market expert says

Jason Ma
Updated December 9, 2024 3 min read

U.S. dominance over global financial markets has reached extreme levels, pointing to a bubble of epic proportions, according to Ruchir Sharma, chair of Rockefeller International.

In a column in the Financial Times last week, the market expert said investors around the world are putting more money in a single country than ever before.

"Awe of 'American exceptionalism' in markets has now gone too far," warned Sharma, who authored the recent book What Went Wrong With Capitalism.

For example, U.S. companies now account for 70% of the leading global stock index, up from 30% in the 1980s, while the U.S. economy's share of global GDP is just 27%, he noted.

To be sure, U.S. growth has been more robust than elsewhere lately, and American companies are among the most profitable. But Sharma pointed to other metrics that indicate how out of whack markets have become, even after factoring out the AI boom that has sent a handful of U.S. tech stocks to stratospheric levels.

Indexes that weight stocks by price instead of market cap and adjust for the leading tech giants show that the U.S. has outperformed the rest of the world by more than 4-to-1 since 2009, he explained.

And such outperformance isn't restricted to stocks either. In 2024 alone, $1 trillion in foreign capital has poured into U.S. debt markets, nearly double what the eurozone has attracted. And America controls more than 70% of the global market for private equity and credit.

"In the past, including the roaring 1920s and the dotcom era, a rising U.S. market would lift other markets," Sharma wrote. "Today, a booming U.S. market is sucking money out of the others."

A mania in market sentiment can impact the real economy, he warned. For instance, investors abandoning smaller markets can weaken currencies and force central banks to hike rates—slowing those economies and worsening their fundamentals.

"Talk of bubbles in tech or AI, or in investment strategies focused on growth and momentum, obscures the mother of all bubbles in U.S. markets," Sharma added. "Thoroughly dominating the mind space of global investors, America is over-owned, overvalued, and overhyped to a degree never seen before."

His admonition echoes what Allianz chief economic advisor Mohamed El-Erian said last month, when he told Bloomberg TV to expect a " huge sucking sound" of foreign capital flooding into the U.S.

The rest of the world may have more trouble coping with a period of faster growth and hotter inflation, adding to America’s relative edge, he predicted.

“This is a period in which U.S. dominance of the global system is going to increase, both for positive reasons and for negative reasons in the short term,” El-Erian said.

Meanwhile, "black swan" investor Mark Spitznagel, founder and chief investment officer of the hedge fund Universa Investments, has been warning about a bubble for a while now.

Last year, he said the " greatest credit bubble in human history" was set to pop, and said again in June that the bubble was about to burst. In September, he said markets had already entered black swan territory.

After massive stock gains in 2023 and this year, Wall Street expects the good times to keep rolling in 2025. Bank of America sees the S&P 500 reaching 6,666 by the end of next year, and CFRA sees it hitting 6,585, with both representing upside of about 8%. And market guru Ed Yardeni has a target of 7,000 by then, indicating a 15% surge.

Correction, Dec. 9, 2024: A previous version of this article misstated Mark Spitznagel's founder title.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (13095)12/24/2024 3:18:25 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13780
 
A massive, embattled copper mine in Panama turns to Trump for rescue


Tim McDonnell

Dec 20, 2024, 2:56pm GMT+3
net zero

The CEO of the company running one of the world’s largest and most embattled copper mines wants US President-elect Donald Trump to help rescue the project before the legal battles over its future turn uglier.

Tristan Pascall, who leads First Quantum Minerals, told Semafor that the Cobre Panama mine — a $10 billion project deep in the Panamanian jungle that has been shuttered by the government since November 2023 because of disputes related to tax rates and other issues — could be a vital source of raw materials for US companies chasing clean energy, advanced manufacturing, and artificial intelligence. But first it has to reopen. With the firm spending about $12 million a month just to maintain the mine’s physical integrity, time is running out to reach a deal with Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino Quintero before Pascall says First Quantum will have to pursue arbitration.

With Trump looking to take a hawkish stance on China — the world’s top copper consumer — and a secretary of state nominee, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who has close ties to Latin America, Pascall aims to pitch the administration for its support in reviving the mine.

AD

“There’s a huge opportunity for the incoming administration in this space,” he said. “There’s absolutely a deal for Trump to do on copper that lines up with the strategic interests of the US and of Panama.”

Tim’s view
Critical minerals play a major role in America’s economic competition with China. The race to develop mineral projects overseas will only become more important as markets tighten. The US still sources most of its critical minerals from China, and the Biden administration was criticized by some economists for moving too slowly to diversify that supply chain, for example by striking new free-trade agreements with mineral-rich countries in Africa and Latin America.

The rush for global minerals is to a large extent a zero-sum game: Much of whatever isn’t locked up in long-term offtake deals by the US will likely go to China. So even if Trump isn’t enthused about supporting US clean energy companies per se, he could look at overseas mining as a forum in which to squeeze China. There aren’t many paths available for the US to lock in large new streams of copper in the near term: Cobre Panama is one.

AD

Disputes over the mine date at least to the early 2010s, when Pascall’s father acquired the site and forged a close relationship with then-Panama President Juan Carlos Varela. The project was grandfathered into a low royalty rate that eventually, as copper prices began to climb, drew increasing public scrutiny even as the mine became one of Panama’s biggest employers. Environmental groups also protested against the mine’s impact on the surrounding ecosystem. Eventually Panama’s top court ruled the mine’s contract unconstitutional, and it was closed.

While the Biden administration worked to support other new mining projects in Brazil and Argentina, it “didn’t really get involved in,” the Cobre Panama dispute, said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the critical minerals security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank. That was frustrating to some in the mining sector, she said: “[The US] actually had a lot of room to negotiate, to be supportive, and we didn’t.”

There are a number of steps the Trump administration could take to catch up to China in Latin America’s minerals market, Baskaran said. It could broaden the pool of countries that US companies can source minerals from and be eligible to claim Inflation Reduction Act tax credits. It can tap the US International Development Finance Corporation to underwrite projects and lower the cost of capital for private developers. It could add copper to the federal critical minerals list, which would make copper projects eligible for more investment incentives. And it could appoint ambassadors to mineral-rich countries who understand the market and are motivated to hammer out deals.

AD

In the case of Panama, Trump is already likely to be in close contact with Quintero about the flow of migrants through the Darién Gap, and could include copper in a larger deal on immigration. For First Quantum’s part, Pascall acknowledged that the company has fallen short in the past on ensuring the project benefits a majority of Panamanians, and said he remains optimistic that an agreement on the mine’s tax rates and environmental protection measures can be reached in 2025. “We need to deliver outcomes that people understand,” he said. But with the company’s shareholders — most based in the US — looking on, it needs to find a conclusion soon: “Nobody can defy gravity forever.”

Room for Disagreement
Urgency around the Cobre Panama mine would be greater if the copper market was in more dire straits, but weakening demand in China could send prices downward in 2025, analysts say. That trend would accelerate if Trump ramps up tariffs on Chinese exports.

Notable


AD