Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : MIRANDOR-MIQ ON MONTREAL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: link who wrote (1682)	2/21/1998 7:49:00 PM
From: Stocks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2635

Link....you actually think that it was Agora's group who suddenly started selling their shares and created this pullback....so who stopped buying them???? Back in September 1997, Agora issued to it's subscribers a freeze on selling any shares until the first set of results came out, but the stock went down 30% after those results, so who was it back then that was selling since the subscriber's were told not to. Why don't you look at it from another perspective the stock is up on anticipation of news and pulled back a little on no news having come out yet!! At least Agora has provided us with good information while they've been associated with MIQ and 1998 will probably have more to come. Brandon

To: link who wrote (1682)	2/22/1998 8:06:00 PM
From: AGORA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2635

Good evening, Link. What we truly find difficult to reconcile is that you would make such a statement out of context. Clarification? Surely, if you are in possession of information that tells you we are selling some stock above .45, then you must also be in possession of the same information which states that we took SIX (6) positions in MIQ from .70, all the way down to .26. By posting information out of context, you are clearly attempting to mislead people on this thread. Now that we have a much clearer picture, perhaps you can explain how SIX (6) purchases at different points from .70 down to .26 had no effect at increasing the price but ONE (1) sale at .45 led to a depreciating effect on the MIQ price? We have always conducted ourselves in a professional manner and will continue to do so. There is no better indication of this than the fact our comments can be seen by virtually anyone. However, situations like this make us regret the Internet is a place where most continue to hide behind pseudonyms while throwing stones... and inaccurate ones at that. Regards, Agora. -------------------------------------