SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (313749)12/19/2024 12:32:56 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 360374
 
Such nonsense. You cannot call a bad poll fraud!

If you did NO one would ever do them again!

How is society going to operate in those conditions?

You don't understand anything!

This will be thrown out of court.

You cannot have fucking law suits every time a pollster gets it wrong.

What is wrong with you!

I can see why you like Trump!

<
essage #313749 from i-node at 12/19/2024 12:18:18 PM

His law suit against the Des Moines register, and the pollster, is a frivolous law suit Trump knows he cannot win!

He is doing it to serve notice that ANYBODY, or news outlet, that says anything against him, he will sue.The lawsuit is legitimate. Because there is a legitimate question as to whether the poll was an attempt to throw the election. If it was, then this would be fraud. Even though he went on to win, it would have been a fraudulent act to intentionally misstated the poll, and the size of the error is far too bit for it to have been a simple mistake.

This appears to have been the ENRON OF POLLING.

Mistakes in polling of this magnitude simply can't happen if basic statistical procedures are applied. And after development the numbers, the pollster has a responsibility to review the findings and determine whether they were reasonable.

Had the election been closer, whatever was done here could have changed the outcome of the election. We need to get to the bottom of it.

Anyone who would block the legal action, it seems to me, is simply trying to justify cheating, which is what you guys do.

I invite anyone here to make the counter-argument.



To: i-node who wrote (313749)12/19/2024 12:43:03 PM
From: Doo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 360374
 
this would be fraud
The claim is "consumer fraud," but, either way, please let us know what "damages" were caused if one assumes the other essential elements of the claim have been plead with specificity and were proved by a preponderance of the evidence.