Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (313757)	12/19/2024 1:25:37 PM
From: Doo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361484

in an effort to commit election fraud Nope. Not a theory of consumer protection fraud. There are federal and state criminal statutes for that behavior. A suggestion I've made before, and I'll make it again. Why don't you just stick to accounting or whatever it is you claim to be expert at instead of stinking up the board with ignorant nonsense? Or, just wait until Turdley comes out on the issues you think important, and post that shill's nonsense? EDIT: Forgot -- consumer fraud statutes are usually deemed to cover only "sale of goods" in commerce. I can't see how a newspaper publishing a pollster's result after years of working with her could come close to a "good" as that term is defined in state statutes around the US.