Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (313789)	12/19/2024 4:58:47 PM
From: Doo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361309

Yep. And add in all the newspapers and other media for publishing the candidate's lies. Newspapers Fraud. What don't you understand?!?!? :0) Consumer Fraud PROTECTIONS Devour the ALL OF MANKIND!! What was intended to protect consumers from defective or misrepresented products now covers everything imaginable.

To: Lane3 who wrote (313789)	12/19/2024 5:02:16 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By longz Maple MAGA Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 361309

>> Is he saying that whenever you lie during a campaign hoping for votes for yourself or your guy, you've committed actionable fraud? Not whenever. But when the lie causes the campaign to waste valuable resources, why not? The public has a reasonable expectation that pollsters will not misrepresent finds. Which is the reason I've suggested they should be going after her workpapers (or Harris, whoever dreamed up this lie of a poll) in an effort to develop a fraudulent result for the election outcome. It is interesting she walked away from her career immediately after the numbers came out. Perhaps it was the fault of someone she hired or associated with. But she had to have known that were fake numbers. IF someone had walked to me and said, "Yeah, in Texas they're going for Camala big-time" I would have instantly called them a liar. Without even counting a vote. I think she has some burden not to lie about her numbers. Clearly, she felt the weight of that burden when she quit her job the day after.

To: Lane3 who wrote (313789)	12/19/2024 10:53:41 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By longz Maple MAGA Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 361309

>> Start with Mexico will pay for the wall or tariffs will replace the income tax. The fundamental problem with your logic is that you're referring to Trump's words as lies when it was in fact your political team who stood in the way of Trump's accomplishments. Let's see if Trump is able to circumvent Democrat's sleazy actions. This time around, he isn't showing up with the expectation that playing nice is a good way forward. Let's see where we are when the decapitations are over.