SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (209602)12/22/2024 1:03:23 AM
From: Maple MAGA 3 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
marcher
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217557
 
If it ever happens it would be triggered by a water or energy crisis where the US+A needed, water, gas, oil or uranium or other non-renewable and our woke leaders would not negotiate.
Different history Different tax regime Different languages
Different land title system Different indigenous treaties Different weights and measures


Once upon a time Canadians were called “hewers of wood and drawers of water” and we were good at it. Thanks to imbeciles like Trudeau, we no longer excel in that department, Canadians built the BlackBerry, the coolest telecommunication device ever, the Avro Arrow jet which was scrapped by another incompetent Prime Minister. Canada has made huge contributions to science and technology.
"The phrase “hewers of wood and drawers of water” is a biblical reference to people who perform menial, labor-intensive tasks or are forced to work hard: In the Bible, Joshua made the Gibeonites into slaves who cut wood and carried water for the Israelites. Canadian economist Harold Innis used the phrase in his 1930 book, The Fur Trade in Canada, to describe Canada's traditional economic dependence on resource production."
I think the Canadian Medicare system sucks, if a family member is really sick, we head to the Mayo Clinic. I consider myself very lucky to have a great South African doctor, but he does not have access to the same diagnostic equipment his compatriots have south of the border.

What about French language rights? The French and Metis under Canadian Confederation are on a pedestal in the US+A they are called Cajuns and have no special rights, in Canada they are Aristocrats.

Would the US+A recognize Canadian's indigenous people's rights, they are governed by over 70 different treaties. Canadian Indians here know they have a better deal than Indians in the US+A.
rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca

And don't forget our myths and legends, more money went to the Klondike to find gold than was ever returned in gold. A few fortunes were made but mostly people died and were bankrupt.



Historical Events

The British and French colonial empires contested over Canada through several wars:

Quebec expedition (1711)

King George's War (1744–1748)

French and Indian War (1724–1763)

The United States invaded Canada in two wars:

Invasion of Canada (1775), American Revolutionary War

Invasion of Canada (1812), War of 1812

American rebels from the Hunters' Lodges invaded Canada in the Patriot War (1837–1838) and the

Battle of the Windmill in 1838

Fenian raids (1866 and 1871)

War Plan Red (mid-1920s), a U.S. invasion plan created as a contingency for the unlikely event of war with the United Kingdom



Chat GPT analysis of your query

The idea of Canada and the USA merging into one country, with Canada becoming the "51st state," is a fascinating and complex proposition, but it faces many substantial hurdles—legal, political, cultural, and historical. Let's break down the key points and why such a merger is highly unlikely.

1. Cultural and National Identity
  • Cultural Differences: Despite similarities in language and some historical connections, Canada and the USA have distinct national identities. Canada, with its British colonial heritage and a constitutional monarchy, has a strong sense of independence and pride in its multiculturalism. The United States, on the other hand, is rooted in a revolutionary history focused on republicanism and the ideals of individualism and freedom. While both countries share some similar values, their political cultures, histories, and worldviews differ significantly.
  • Canadian Identity: Many Canadians strongly value their national identity, which is separate from the American identity. The idea of losing that distinctiveness in a merger would be deeply unpopular for many Canadians, particularly considering the pride they take in their unique political, social, and cultural achievements.
2. Political and Constitutional Hurdles
  • Constitutional Challenges: For Canada to merge with the USA, a complete overhaul of both countries' constitutions would be required. Canada's Constitution, which includes the Constitution Act, 1982, and the British North America Act, 1867, outlines the country's political structure and defines the relationship between provinces and the federal government. Canada would need to abolish its current constitutional monarchy (with the British monarch as the head of state) and adopt the U.S. model of governance.
  • U.S. Constitution: The United States would also need to amend its Constitution, especially in regard to the structure of the Senate (as adding Canada would radically alter the balance of power). Each state has equal representation in the Senate, and the U.S. would have to figure out how to integrate Canada's provinces into the existing federal system. The Electoral College system would also have to be recalibrated to account for Canada's population.
3. Political Will and Public Opinion
  • Canada's Political System: Canada is a sovereign country with a parliamentary system, and any decision to join the U.S. would need widespread political support, including from provincial governments and the Canadian populace. This would likely require a national referendum, which would almost certainly fail given the strong national pride and desire for independence that many Canadians hold.
  • Public Opinion: Public opinion in Canada would likely reject the notion of becoming the 51st state. While some Canadians may entertain the idea of closer integration with the U.S. (such as through trade agreements or shared defense initiatives), most are satisfied with the existing relationship as two sovereign nations. Canada’s political elite, including its leaders, would also likely resist any idea of merging with the U.S. due to the risks of losing sovereignty, especially in areas like health care, the legal system, and cultural policies.
4. Economic and Social Impacts
  • Economic Integration: Canada and the U.S. are already deeply integrated economically through trade agreements like NAFTA (now replaced by USMCA). The economies are closely tied, and many Canadians benefit from trade with the U.S. However, becoming the 51st state would likely result in significant economic changes, particularly in terms of taxes, health care, and social services. The Canadian social safety net would likely be diminished in favor of American systems, which may not be acceptable to many Canadians.
  • Impact on Canadian Provinces: Canada’s provinces have significant autonomy, and integrating them into the U.S. system would likely result in the loss of this autonomy. Canadians would also likely lose many of the benefits associated with being a smaller, more manageable country, such as the ability to implement policies tailored to Canadian needs rather than those of a much larger and diverse country.
5. The Role of the UK and the Monarchy
  • Monarchy: The suggestion that King Charles might become the head of state for both the U.S. and Canada under a merged nation is highly speculative and unlikely. The U.S. is a republic and has no interest in reintroducing a monarchy. Additionally, Canada would have to abandon its relationship with the British monarchy, which is deeply embedded in the country's identity and legal system.
6. Historical Precedents
  • Historical Context: The idea of Canadian annexation has been around for centuries. During the 19th century, there were discussions about the possibility of Canada joining the U.S. (especially in the aftermath of the American Revolution and the War of 1812), but these ideas were consistently rejected by Canadians. In modern times, the idea of annexation is generally seen as a non-starter due to the factors listed above.
7. Geopolitical Considerations
  • International Relations: Canada is an active member of many international organizations, such as the United Nations, NATO, and the Commonwealth. Becoming part of the United States would alter its standing on the global stage. For example, Canada would lose its independent voice in international diplomacy and its ability to shape policy decisions at forums like the UN.
  • Border Issues: Canada and the U.S. have one of the longest undefended borders in the world, but merging the two countries would have logistical consequences for trade, defense, and immigration. Canada would also have to align its foreign policy and military strategy with the U.S., which could complicate matters for Canadians who value their independent stance on global issues.
Conclusion: Why It Wouldn't Work

In short, while it's theoretically possible for Canada to join the U.S. as the 51st state, the challenges are immense. The deep cultural, political, and economic differences between the two countries would create resistance from both sides. Moreover, Canada's sense of national identity, its desire to maintain sovereignty, and the practical issues related to governance, constitutional amendments, and public opinion make such a merger unlikely.

The idea of a "celebration time soon" might be premature unless the political and cultural landscape drastically changes in ways that are hard to foresee. But as of now, there is little to suggest that such a merger would be embraced by either the Canadian or American public, or by the leaders of either country.