SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Mansfield who wrote (11845)2/21/1998 5:56:00 PM
From: Zebra 365  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 31646
 
Technology: The Other Side Of 2000

By Eric J. Savitz

Well, here we are, less than 680 days until the air-traffic control system conks out, our credit cards become useless, the telephone network shuts down and the global financial system grinds to a halt. That's all supposed to happen, of course, because a bunch of COBOL programmers 30 years ago thought two digits would be enough to tell a computer the current year. By now, you've doubtless heard all the dire projections about the dreaded Year 2000 problem, including the forecast that the cost of fixing the mammoth software glitch will be in the neighborhood of $600 billion.

For investors, the Year 2000 problem was supposed to create billions in new wealth, as Corporate America spent wildly to avoid computational Armageddon. The Internet is littered with "Y2K" investment sites; online bulletin boards like the Motley Fool and Silicon Investor overflow with Year 2000 chatter. Somewhere along the way, however, reality has diverted away from expectations, Barron's reports.

In short, some of the highest-profile companies trying to solve the Year 2000 problem -- the Y2K stocks -- have turned into investment nightmares. Viasoft, long the best-known name in the millennium industry, a stock that as recently as last summer traded for more than $60 a share, has dropped to 30, hurt by disappointing results. Data Dimensions, which peaked last fall at close to 40, has plunged below 15. Zitel, which for one bright, shining moment a year ago topped 72, now changes hands for 12. Peritus Software Services, public for less than a year, has dropped to 15, from a peak of 32 just after it came out last summer. SEEC, which peaked last fall above 30, has slumped back to the high teens.

A second group of Year 2000 stocks, however, has continued to march higher. Keane has more than doubled since April. Micro Focus Group has soared from 10 to 50 in two years. Computer Horizons has zipped from less than 30 to more than 50 since November. Accelr8 Technology has run up from less than 10 to about 25 in a little over a year.(I think we know another company that fits in this group. i.e. TAVA has more than quadrupled since June)

What the heck is going on?

John Force, manager of PBHG Technology fund, notes that the stocks that have suffered the most, like Viasoft, Data Dimensions and Zitel, are of "magic-bullet" companies trying to solve the problem with software tools. Damian Rinaldi, an analyst with First Albany, observes that many companies seem to outsource their year-2000 work to companies like Keane and Computer Horizons rather than buying tools and doing it themselves. "There was a lot of anticipation that people would do more work in-house," Rinaldi says. "Expectations were for more rapid tool buying than has been the case." In other words, solving the biggest computing glitch of all times has been more effectively attacked with man hours than brain power. At the same time, some observers think Corporate America continues to underestimate the time and money involved in fixing the problem. In a recent report, Forrester Research asserts that large companies have underestimated by 25% the work required for Y2K assessment, repair and testing.

"So instead of being nearly done, large companies are only 34% through the job, on average," Forrester contends. "Even if Y2K teams can accomplish twice as much work in 1998 as they did in 1997, they will have finished only 68% of the total job by December 31, 1998. When users wake up to this reality, the demand for Y2K help will escalate." Over the next 24 months, Forrester predicts, year-2000 service providers will be able to choose the work they want to do, increase prices -- by 15% a year -- and dictate contract terms.

DOW JONES NEWS 02-21-98 05:17 AM

Obviously this is about COBOL and not embedded systems, the reason I posted it here was to demonstrate that Everyone is dragging their feet on this problem, and those with factory floors are no exception. I think, when it reaches the eleventh hour for embedded systems, THAT is when we'll see the TAVA CD-ROM and database selling "like popcorn." Of course, Cheryl will be out there pitching for action sooner, and I don't think we should underestimate the effect of all those Y2K disclosures, now required for the first time by the SEC, that will be coming out in the April 10Q's.

Zebra



To: John Mansfield who wrote (11845)2/22/1998 7:01:00 AM
From: John Mansfield  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
UK Sunday Times: 'Cap estimates that the biggest worry will come in the area of embedded systems'

Just a couple of such articles in leading news magazines, and:
not much time left to load up on TAVA at these prices, IMO ;-)

John
__________________________________________

'One in six 'will miss 2000 bug deadline'

ONE in six companies - representing 38 per cent of gross domestic product - will fail to meet the December 31, 1999, deadline for sorting out millennium bug problems, according to Cap Gemini <snip>

Cap estimates that the biggest worry will come in the area of embedded systems, where almost half of companies have not allocated a budget for sorting out the issue and a quarter did not realise they had a problem. The firm also estimates that the demand for computer experts able to carry out the work exceeds availability early this year.

________________________

sunday-times.co.uk



To: John Mansfield who wrote (11845)2/24/1998 4:40:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 31646
 
' Automotive Industry Action Group has released an informational Year 2000 video'

The following message of the AIAG (POST 1) is a nice follow up on a previous post of me (POST 2); copied below. The AIAG video is further evidence of the aggressive stance towards all suppliers of the automotive industry; presumably GM included.

TAVA is full involved in this proces IMO.

Regards,

John

______________________

POST 1 on the video:

The Automotive Industry Action Group has released an informational Year 2000 video and a compliance checklist.

'APAA's Electronic Commerce Committee is identifying issues and solutions related to "Year 2000" programming problems. The following Web sites provide extensive information on these problems. Additional information specific to the automotive aftermarket will be posted on this site in the future.

The Automotive Industry Action Group has released an informational Year 2000 video and a compliance checklist. The video works to help suppliers understand the cause, magnitude and potential implications of the year 2000. The video can be ordered for $25 from AIAG at 248-358-3003. Or, go to AIAG's Web site at www.aaig.org '

exchange2000.com
______________________________

POST 2 on GM / AIAG / TAVA:

apaa.org

I have posted this some days ago:
_____

Jenkins: 'And we're involved with them in their supply chain just launching right now, moving out to look at the Y2K readiness of many of their suppliers, as I mentioned earlier. '

From:
exchange2000.com

'The undertaking by the automotive industry via AIAG is massive. With nearly 50 000 Tier-1 suppliers and 500 000 total suppliers throughout the chain...'

'....AIAG Assessment Certified and asked if he would care to comment.'

And then read the lines on the TAVA GM engagement below! GM is very active in the AIAG Y2K initiatives; TAVA comes in as a solution provider:

From
vcall.com

'John Jenkins: ÿNo. Not at all. Kevin, you want to talk about General Motors?

Kevin Fallon: ÿYes. I'd like to give just a quick backdrop of GM. In our feeling, General Motors and Kraft are actually in the lead position in the Y2K rollout. And General Motors wrote a test document that's rapidly being adopted as the industry standard. And obviously, in any information, one issue is quantity, but the more important thing is quality.

What we're seeing is a lot of the vendors and suppliers are claiming that their products are compliant when, indeed, through tests and further research, it's found out that the products are not compliant.

So General Motors has written a test document that now has been adopted by AIAG, which is the Automotive Industry Action Group. And, from my belief, Chrysler and Ford have adopted this same standard.

And we've taken this standard out across other industries to try and get the awareness up and get a higher bar, so to speak, on this whole compliance issue in the process area and the embedded systems.

I tell you we're getting down to our relationship with General Motors. We have several contracts with them.

One is working with one of their divisions, Allison Transmissions. We have- there's a small contract today.

We are also part of their standards team that's evolving and developing that GM standard that's just been adopted by IEEE out there, and we have two voting members on the IEEE year 2000 subcommittee for manufacturing and embedded systems.

Also we are working with GM, and finalizing discussions, and working in research and testing as opposed to the standard document itself. And we're involved with them in their supply chain just launching right now, moving out to look at the Y2K readiness of many of their suppliers, as I mentioned earlier. '