Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN who wrote (191726)	12/23/2024 11:52:59 AM
From: engineer	3 Recommendations Recommended By manning18 RoseCampion sbfm Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 196725

would have thought that the misuse of IP from NUVIA would be in there as well.

To: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN who wrote (191726)	12/23/2024 12:04:20 PM
From: RoseCampion	17 Recommendations Recommended By abcs AlfaNut BDAZZ bife Bill Wolf and 12 more members Respond to of 196725

It'd be legal malpractice if Q's legal team handling the counter-suit didn't take Son's statements concerning ARM's plans and ambitions in the chip space directly from this Bloomberg interview, then highlight them in contrast with the testimony given on the same subject during the recently-ended trial...because they seem to conflict pretty directly. Doing so would lay bare ARM's "we say only what we want you to hear" game and provide, IMHO, some pretty powerful ammunition in the "motive" department for their withholding of information.