Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (191744)	12/24/2024 1:13:29 PM
From: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN	4 Recommendations Recommended By GR8FORM Lance Bredvold manning18 sbfm Respond to of 196747

>Does prejudice in Arm's lawsuit have any impact within Qualcomm's separate suite? My understanding is yes that is not able to be litigated any further, even in their counter suit. However remember that was about ARM breaching Nuvia's TLA. Now that Qualcomm owns the CMN IP and Booker IP perhaps its yet another violation of Qualcomm's TLA/ALA that they're still using it. And that's how they're going to litigate it if they are preparing to do so. I believe the more realistic view on this is that litigating this was too dangerous and close to what Arm was claiming Qualcomm did? If they were prepared to litigate that then it may risk losing the big picture question (QC is properly licensed under their ALA). Perhaps they chalked it up to "doing business" in order to secure the more important ruling. In reality we need to wait for the redacted claims, should be out the week of the 6th I assume, there was another request to extend timing for that release due to the holiday season.