SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Skinner who wrote (48488)2/21/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: Kashish King  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
Robert, the message there is clear: they are basing a decision on anecdotal information, ergo, they are entirely in the wrong line of work. Aside from deliberately embarrassing themselves, it's not clear what they hope to achieve with their little biologist-turned-computer-electronics-design-engineer stunt. The reports from the field are unambiguous and crystal clear: there are fundamental reliability problems with this product. Iomega is bent on turning this fundamental flaw into a serious of personal experiences. I'm not buying it; PC WEEK isn't buying it; and neither should any self-respecting and/or so-called scientist.



To: Robert Skinner who wrote (48488)2/21/1998 10:15:00 PM
From: Kashish King  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Robert, when can we expect the announced PC WEEK lawsuit for printing false information which makes Oprah Winfrey's (sp?) cattle prodding look tame? I have first-hand experience with some of the comments made in that article and there are several people who can attest to that.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News